2009•Clinical Education of General PracticeRequires access

Comparison between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in elderly patients

Cai Xiuju

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical values between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients. Method Patients over 60 years old undergoing cholecystectomy were investigated and were divided into two groups. Group LC (n=120) was performed under laparoscopic procedure, group OC (n=56) under open procedure. Results Compared with the OC group, the mean average operation time, blood lost, the peristaltic sound recovery time and the length of postoperative stay in the LC group were much less (t= 2.36,2.26,2.88,2.47,P 0.05 ). There was no serious postoperative complications and no death in both groups. Conclusions LC is an effective, safe and minimally invasive operation, and it is superior to OC for the old people.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the clinical values between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients. Method Patients over 60 years old undergoing cholecystectomy were investigated and were divided into two groups. Group LC (n=120) was performed under laparoscopic procedure, group OC (n=56) under open procedure. Results Compared with the OC group, the mean average operation time, blood lost, the peristaltic sound recovery time and the length of postoperative stay in the LC group were much less (t= 2.36,2.26,2.88,2.47,P 0.05 ). There was no serious postoperative complications and no death in both groups. Conclusions LC is an effective, safe and minimally invasive operation, and it is superior to OC for the old people.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the clinical values between laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) in elderly patients. Method Patients over 60 years old undergoing cholecystectomy were investigated and were divided into two groups. Group LC (n=120) was performed under laparoscopic procedure, group OC (n=56) under open procedure. Results Compared with the OC group, the mean average operation time, blood lost, the peristaltic sound recovery time and the length of postoperative stay in the LC group were much less (t= 2.36,2.26,2.88,2.47,P 0.05 ). There was no serious postoperative complications and no death in both groups. Conclusions LC is an effective, safe and minimally invasive operation, and it is superior to OC for the old people.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Laparotomy, Cholecystectomy, Open cholecystectomy, Surgery, Blood loss, Laparoscopy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparotomy in elderly patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens