2004Zhongguo Renmin Daxue xuebaoRequires access

The Secondary Nature of Law and the Concept of Intellectual Property

Li Chen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Law is secondary in contrast with primary social reality, because it has independent regulation function. The secondary nature of law can act as common point for the divergent doctrines about the concept of property. For the behaviour-regulating function of right, the conformation of and the derivative behaviours of utilizing are the most meaningful elements. So the scientific concept of must be gestated in the new doctrines that concern the conformation of object of right. The traditional intangible property doctrine and intellectual production doctrine are necessary to be transcended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Law is secondary in contrast with primary social reality, because it has independent regulation function. The secondary nature of law can act as common point for the divergent doctrines about the concept of property. For the behaviour-regulating function of right, the conformation of and the derivative behaviours of utilizing are the most meaningful elements. So the scientific concept of must be gestated in the new doctrines that concern the conformation of object of right. The traditional intangible property doctrine and intellectual production doctrine are necessary to be transcended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Law is secondary in contrast with primary social reality, because it has independent regulation function. The secondary nature of law can act as common point for the divergent doctrines about the concept of property. For the behaviour-regulating function of right, the conformation of and the derivative behaviours of utilizing are the most meaningful elements. So the scientific concept of must be gestated in the new doctrines that concern the conformation of object of right. The traditional intangible property doctrine and intellectual production doctrine are necessary to be transcended.

Key concepts: Doctrine, Intellectual property, Object (grammar), Property (philosophy), Function (biology), Law and economics, Law, Production (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Secondary Nature of Law and the Concept of Intellectual Property — Research Paper | ScholarLens