The Secondary Nature of Law and the Concept of Intellectual Property
Li Chen
Abstract
Li Chen
Abstract
Law is secondary in contrast with primary social reality, because it has independent regulation function. The secondary nature of law can act as common point for the divergent doctrines about the concept of property. For the behaviour-regulating function of right, the conformation of and the derivative behaviours of utilizing are the most meaningful elements. So the scientific concept of must be gestated in the new doctrines that concern the conformation of object of right. The traditional intangible property doctrine and intellectual production doctrine are necessary to be transcended.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Law is secondary in contrast with primary social reality, because it has independent regulation function. The secondary nature of law can act as common point for the divergent doctrines about the concept of property. For the behaviour-regulating function of right, the conformation of and the derivative behaviours of utilizing are the most meaningful elements. So the scientific concept of must be gestated in the new doctrines that concern the conformation of object of right. The traditional intangible property doctrine and intellectual production doctrine are necessary to be transcended.
Key concepts: Doctrine, Intellectual property, Object (grammar), Property (philosophy), Function (biology), Law and economics, Law, Production (economics)