From “Curriculum as a Fact” to “Curriculum as a Practice”
HU Dian-shu
Abstract
HU Dian-shu
Abstract
For a long time, curriculums always appear in a as a fact. For the mathematics education, as a fact shows its own obvious limitations: pursuing the logic of knowledge, focusing on the transmission of knowledge, and emphasizing the abstract nature of knowledge. However, as a practice has its advantages of making students experience the course of thinking, emphasizing students' subjectivity and promoting students to contact mathematics with reality. In the context of the mathematics curriculum reform, mathematics curriculum issues need to be viewed as a practice, and we should advocate as a practice.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For a long time, curriculums always appear in a as a fact. For the mathematics education, as a fact shows its own obvious limitations: pursuing the logic of knowledge, focusing on the transmission of knowledge, and emphasizing the abstract nature of knowledge. However, as a practice has its advantages of making students experience the course of thinking, emphasizing students' subjectivity and promoting students to contact mathematics with reality. In the context of the mathematics curriculum reform, mathematics curriculum issues need to be viewed as a practice, and we should advocate as a practice.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Mathematics education, Subjectivity, Context (archaeology), Curriculum theory, Pedagogy, Emergent curriculum, Curriculum mapping