2013Unpublished venueRequires access

The dynamic analysis on ecological footprint and ecological capacity of Hebei province

Xianshi Li, Jian Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to investigate ecological carrying capacity of Hebei province during 2005 and 2011. The ecological footprint and carrying capacity were analyzed with ecological footprint model, and the difference between ecological footprint and carrying capacity was concluded. Furthermore, an assessment was made on the ecological footprint per ten thousand GDP during 2005 and 2011 by the method of ecological footprint to evaluate the sustainable development. The results showed that: (1) the ecological footprint per capita of Hebei province had increased year by year from 2.6566hm2to 3.3233hm2. The changes of the ecological carrying capacity per capita were not significantly, the ecological deficit per capita increased from 2.0856hm2to 2.7548hm2. (2) The ecological capacity per capita basically maintained at 0.5640hm2-0.5759hm2. (3) The ecological deficit increased at an annual growth rate of 5%. (4) Ecological footprint per ten thousand Yuan GDP decreased from 1.0668 hm2to 0.4602 hm2.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this paper was to investigate ecological carrying capacity of Hebei province during 2005 and 2011. The ecological footprint and carrying capacity were analyzed with ecological footprint model, and the difference between ecological footprint and carrying capacity was concluded. Furthermore, an assessment was made on the ecological footprint per ten thousand GDP during 2005 and 2011 by the method of ecological footprint to evaluate the sustainable development. The results showed that: (1) the ecological footprint per capita of Hebei province had increased year by year from 2.6566hm2to 3.3233hm2. The changes of the ecological carrying capacity per capita were not significantly, the ecological deficit per capita increased from 2.0856hm2to 2.7548hm2. (2) The ecological capacity per capita basically maintained at 0.5640hm2-0.5759hm2. (3) The ecological deficit increased at an annual growth rate of 5%. (4) Ecological footprint per ten thousand Yuan GDP decreased from 1.0668 hm2to 0.4602 hm2.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this paper was to investigate ecological carrying capacity of Hebei province during 2005 and 2011. The ecological footprint and carrying capacity were analyzed with ecological footprint model, and the difference between ecological footprint and carrying capacity was concluded. Furthermore, an assessment was made on the ecological footprint per ten thousand GDP during 2005 and 2011 by the method of ecological footprint to evaluate the sustainable development. The results showed that: (1) the ecological footprint per capita of Hebei province had increased year by year from 2.6566hm2to 3.3233hm2. The changes of the ecological carrying capacity per capita were not significantly, the ecological deficit per capita increased from 2.0856hm2to 2.7548hm2. (2) The ecological capacity per capita basically maintained at 0.5640hm2-0.5759hm2. (3) The ecological deficit increased at an annual growth rate of 5%. (4) Ecological footprint per ten thousand Yuan GDP decreased from 1.0668 hm2to 0.4602 hm2.

Key concepts: Ecological footprint, Per capita, Footprint, Sustainable development, Ecological deficit, Ecology, Computer science, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The dynamic analysis on ecological footprint and ecological capacity of Hebei province — Research Paper | ScholarLens