Setting objectives for Demand-Side Management. Topic report 1
Richard A. Wayland, E.C. Brusger, DANIEL H. JONES
Abstract
Richard A. Wayland, E.C. Brusger, DANIEL H. JONES
Abstract
This report is the first in a series being developed under Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) RP2548, Demand-Side Management (DSM), which will integrate the data, information, and tools pertaining to utilities' ability to influence their load levels and shapes. This report focuses on the utility environment, planning processes, and analytical requirements bearing on the setting and implementation of DSM objectives. The report first explores the reasons why many utilities have found it difficult to develop DSM objectives and concludes that organizational and cultural factors explain much of the difficulty. It next provides a general framework covering five major planning steps. Then it discusses the analytical requirements of objective setting, stressing the distinction between DSM and supply-side planning. It concludes with a case study of the DSM objectives-setting process at Carolina Power and Light Company.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report is the first in a series being developed under Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) RP2548, Demand-Side Management (DSM), which will integrate the data, information, and tools pertaining to utilities' ability to influence their load levels and shapes. This report focuses on the utility environment, planning processes, and analytical requirements bearing on the setting and implementation of DSM objectives. The report first explores the reasons why many utilities have found it difficult to develop DSM objectives and concludes that organizational and cultural factors explain much of the difficulty. It next provides a general framework covering five major planning steps. Then it discusses the analytical requirements of objective setting, stressing the distinction between DSM and supply-side planning. It concludes with a case study of the DSM objectives-setting process at Carolina Power and Light Company.
Key concepts: Demand side, Process (computing), Operations research, Computer science, Management science, Process management, Risk analysis (engineering), Operations management