1987外国语Requires access

Hemingway:The Syntax of Resistance and the Symbolism of Style

Geoffrey, Kain

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When turning to most any introduction to Hemingway’s work, one is directed almost without fail to the stylistic qualities of ironic understatement, terseness, colloquial simphcity—qualities which elucidate intensify the tight-lipped stoic response to a bitter meaningless fate which is typical of Hemingway’s central characters. Useful as these traditional by now anticipated observations are in revealing the author’s art to the uninitiated, there are a few additional stylistic features I would like to emphasize in order to better clarify the fundamental propriety of Hemingway’s style as it corresponds to—in fact embodies—meaning in his fiction. The characteristic feature of Hemingway’s prose style can, I believe, be identified as resistance —resistance, that is, to supplying any connective devices between his sentences other than the coordinate or sequential; connective words such as and or after or then are common

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When turning to most any introduction to Hemingway’s work, one is directed almost without fail to the stylistic qualities of ironic understatement, terseness, colloquial simphcity—qualities which elucidate intensify the tight-lipped stoic response to a bitter meaningless fate which is typical of Hemingway’s central characters. Useful as these traditional by now anticipated observations are in revealing the author’s art to the uninitiated, there are a few additional stylistic features I would like to emphasize in order to better clarify the fundamental propriety of Hemingway’s style as it corresponds to—in fact embodies—meaning in his fiction. The characteristic feature of Hemingway’s prose style can, I believe, be identified as resistance —resistance, that is, to supplying any connective devices between his sentences other than the coordinate or sequential; connective words such as and or after or then are common

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When turning to most any introduction to Hemingway’s work, one is directed almost without fail to the stylistic qualities of ironic understatement, terseness, colloquial simphcity—qualities which elucidate intensify the tight-lipped stoic response to a bitter meaningless fate which is typical of Hemingway’s central characters. Useful as these traditional by now anticipated observations are in revealing the author’s art to the uninitiated, there are a few additional stylistic features I would like to emphasize in order to better clarify the fundamental propriety of Hemingway’s style as it corresponds to—in fact embodies—meaning in his fiction. The characteristic feature of Hemingway’s prose style can, I believe, be identified as resistance —resistance, that is, to supplying any connective devices between his sentences other than the coordinate or sequential; connective words such as and or after or then are common

Key concepts: Style (visual arts), Syntax, Meaning (existential), Resistance (ecology), Linguistics, Feature (linguistics), Literature, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hemingway:The Syntax of Resistance and the Symbolism of Style — Research Paper | ScholarLens