2010PubMedRequires access

E/(EaxSa) estimates left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.

Cristian Mornoş, Dragoş Cozm, Lucian Petrescu, Adina Ionac, Dan Ruşinaru, S DRAGULESCU

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The early diastolic transmitral velocity/early mitral annular diastolic velocity ratio (E/Ea) reflects left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in a variety of cardiac diseases. The value of this parameter in patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. It has been hypothesized that, by combining the index of diastolic function (E/Ea) and a parameter that explores LV systolic performance (Sa, mitral annulus peak systolic velocity), a close prediction of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) can be provided. Hence, the study aim was to assess the relationship between a new parameter, E/(EaxSa), and LVEDP in patients with severe MR. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive patients with severe MR, in sinus rhythm, who had been referred for heart catheterization, was analyzed. Echocardiography was performed simultaneously with LVEDP measurements. Both, E/Ea and E/(EaxSa) were calculated, using the average of the velocities of the septal and lateral mitral annulus. RESULTS: A significant linear correlation was demonstrated between E/(EaxSa) and LVEDP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001); this was superior to E/Ea (r = 0.73, p < 0.001), Sa (r = -0.59, p = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r = 0.57, p = 0.007), E-wave (r = 0.45, p = 0.009), Ea (r = -0.31, p = 0.01), and left atrial volume (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). No significant relationships could be demonstrated between LVEDP and the LV ejection fraction. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for prediction of LVEDP > 15 mmHg was greatest for E/(EaxSa) (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001), followed by the E/Ea ratio (AUC = 0.81, p < 0.001). A statistical comparison of the ROC curves indicated that E/(EaxSa) was more accurate than E/Ea (p = 0.02). The optimal E/(EaxSa) cut-off to predict a LVEDP > 15 mmHg was 1.95 (85% sensitivity, 83% specificity). CONCLUSION: E/(EaxSa) correlates strongly with LVEDP, and can serve as a simple and accurate echocardiographic index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with severe MR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The early diastolic transmitral velocity/early mitral annular diastolic velocity ratio (E/Ea) reflects left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in a variety of cardiac diseases. The value of this parameter in patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. It has been hypothesized that, by combining the index of diastolic function (E/Ea) and a parameter that explores LV systolic performance (Sa, mitral annulus peak systolic velocity), a close prediction of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) can be provided. Hence, the study aim was to assess the relationship between a new parameter, E/(EaxSa), and LVEDP in patients with severe MR. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive patients with severe MR, in sinus rhythm, who had been referred for heart catheterization, was analyzed. Echocardiography was performed simultaneously with LVEDP measurements. Both, E/Ea and E/(EaxSa) were calculated, using the average of the velocities of the septal and lateral mitral annulus. RESULTS: A significant linear correlation was demonstrated between E/(EaxSa) and LVEDP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001); this was superior to E/Ea (r = 0.73, p < 0.001), Sa (r = -0.59, p = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r = 0.57, p = 0.007), E-wave (r = 0.45, p = 0.009), Ea (r = -0.31, p = 0.01), and left atrial volume (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). No significant relationships could be demonstrated between LVEDP and the LV ejection fraction. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for prediction of LVEDP > 15 mmHg was greatest for E/(EaxSa) (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001), followed by the E/Ea ratio (AUC = 0.81, p < 0.001). A statistical comparison of the ROC curves indicated that E/(EaxSa) was more accurate than E/Ea (p = 0.02). The optimal E/(EaxSa) cut-off to predict a LVEDP > 15 mmHg was 1.95 (85% sensitivity, 83% specificity). CONCLUSION: E/(EaxSa) correlates strongly with LVEDP, and can serve as a simple and accurate echocardiographic index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with severe MR.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The early diastolic transmitral velocity/early mitral annular diastolic velocity ratio (E/Ea) reflects left ventricular (LV) filling pressure in a variety of cardiac diseases. The value of this parameter in patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR) remains controversial. It has been hypothesized that, by combining the index of diastolic function (E/Ea) and a parameter that explores LV systolic performance (Sa, mitral annulus peak systolic velocity), a close prediction of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) can be provided. Hence, the study aim was to assess the relationship between a new parameter, E/(EaxSa), and LVEDP in patients with severe MR. METHODS: A total of 55 consecutive patients with severe MR, in sinus rhythm, who had been referred for heart catheterization, was analyzed. Echocardiography was performed simultaneously with LVEDP measurements. Both, E/Ea and E/(EaxSa) were calculated, using the average of the velocities of the septal and lateral mitral annulus. RESULTS: A significant linear correlation was demonstrated between E/(EaxSa) and LVEDP (r = 0.81, p < 0.001); this was superior to E/Ea (r = 0.73, p < 0.001), Sa (r = -0.59, p = 0.004), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (r = 0.57, p = 0.007), E-wave (r = 0.45, p = 0.009), Ea (r = -0.31, p = 0.01), and left atrial volume (r = 0.28, p = 0.02). No significant relationships could be demonstrated between LVEDP and the LV ejection fraction. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for prediction of LVEDP > 15 mmHg was greatest for E/(EaxSa) (AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001), followed by the E/Ea ratio (AUC = 0.81, p < 0.001). A statistical comparison of the ROC curves indicated that E/(EaxSa) was more accurate than E/Ea (p = 0.02). The optimal E/(EaxSa) cut-off to predict a LVEDP > 15 mmHg was 1.95 (85% sensitivity, 83% specificity). CONCLUSION: E/(EaxSa) correlates strongly with LVEDP, and can serve as a simple and accurate echocardiographic index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with severe MR.

Key concepts: Preload, Medicine, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Diastole, Mitral regurgitation, Sinus rhythm, Mitral annulus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
E/(EaxSa) estimates left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens