1961NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)Open access

Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Effects of Wing Bodies, Fences, Flaps, and a Fuselage Addition on the Wing Buffet Response of a Transonic-Transport Model

E. S. Cornette

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The experimental wing buffet response of a transport-type airplane model with and without wing bodies, fences, flaps, and a fuselage addition has been investigated at Mach numbers from 0.20 to 1.03. The wing had NACA 64A-series airfoil sections inclined 5 degrees to the free-stream direction. The quarter-chord line of the wing was swept back 45 degrees, the aspect ratio was 7, the taper ratio was 0.3, and the thickness ratio varied from 0.115 at the root to 0.074 at the midsemispan and was constant from that station to the tip. The wing was twisted and cambered for a design lift coefficient of 0.3. The results of the investigation indicated that a marked reduction of buffet intensity and a delay of buffet onset at transonic speeds were achieved by the addition to the wing of special bodies designed to reduce shock-induced separation. The further addition of wing fences and wing trailing-edge flaps deflected 30 degrees increased the lift coefficients at which low-speed stall buffeting occurred. An addition to the fuselage near the upper forward portion produced no consistent change in the buffet characteristics.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The experimental wing buffet response of a transport-type airplane model with and without wing bodies, fences, flaps, and a fuselage addition has been investigated at Mach numbers from 0.20 to 1.03. The wing had NACA 64A-series airfoil sections inclined 5 degrees to the free-stream direction. The quarter-chord line of the wing was swept back 45 degrees, the aspect ratio was 7, the taper ratio was 0.3, and the thickness ratio varied from 0.115 at the root to 0.074 at the midsemispan and was constant from that station to the tip. The wing was twisted and cambered for a design lift coefficient of 0.3. The results of the investigation indicated that a marked reduction of buffet intensity and a delay of buffet onset at transonic speeds were achieved by the addition to the wing of special bodies designed to reduce shock-induced separation. The further addition of wing fences and wing trailing-edge flaps deflected 30 degrees increased the lift coefficients at which low-speed stall buffeting occurred. An addition to the fuselage near the upper forward portion produced no consistent change in the buffet characteristics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The experimental wing buffet response of a transport-type airplane model with and without wing bodies, fences, flaps, and a fuselage addition has been investigated at Mach numbers from 0.20 to 1.03. The wing had NACA 64A-series airfoil sections inclined 5 degrees to the free-stream direction. The quarter-chord line of the wing was swept back 45 degrees, the aspect ratio was 7, the taper ratio was 0.3, and the thickness ratio varied from 0.115 at the root to 0.074 at the midsemispan and was constant from that station to the tip. The wing was twisted and cambered for a design lift coefficient of 0.3. The results of the investigation indicated that a marked reduction of buffet intensity and a delay of buffet onset at transonic speeds were achieved by the addition to the wing of special bodies designed to reduce shock-induced separation. The further addition of wing fences and wing trailing-edge flaps deflected 30 degrees increased the lift coefficients at which low-speed stall buffeting occurred. An addition to the fuselage near the upper forward portion produced no consistent change in the buffet characteristics.

Key concepts: Wing, Wing loading, Stall (fluid mechanics), Fuselage, Wing twist, Lift coefficient, Airfoil, Transonic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Wind-Tunnel Investigation of the Effects of Wing Bodies, Fences, Flaps, and a Fuselage Addition on the Wing Buffet Response of a Transonic-Transport Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens