1970Journal of AircraftRequires access

Transonic buffet characteristics of a 60-deg swept wing with design variations

J. F. MAYES, M. E. Lores, Holly Barnard

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Wind-tunnel tests of a typical swept wing fighter aircraft were conducted to determine the improvement in the buffet-onset lift coefficient CL^, resulting from wing camber and from leading and trailing edge deflection. The coefficient CLB was determined from trailing edge pressure, wing-root bending moment, fluorescent oil flow photographs, and force data. All four types of data are arranged in a composite graphical form to insure proper CLB selection and to identify the location on the wing where separation first occurs. Results at Mach 0.9 showed that 0.2 increase in camber (airfoil design lift coefficient) increased CLB approximately 0.08; a 5° leading edge droop 0.15; and a 5° inboard trailing edge flap 0.12. Analysis of design trends shown by previous experimental results are described for the effects of wing thickness ratio, sweep, aspect ratio, and camber on CLBSpecific buffet problems related to variable swept wings are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wind-tunnel tests of a typical swept wing fighter aircraft were conducted to determine the improvement in the buffet-onset lift coefficient CL^, resulting from wing camber and from leading and trailing edge deflection. The coefficient CLB was determined from trailing edge pressure, wing-root bending moment, fluorescent oil flow photographs, and force data. All four types of data are arranged in a composite graphical form to insure proper CLB selection and to identify the location on the wing where separation first occurs. Results at Mach 0.9 showed that 0.2 increase in camber (airfoil design lift coefficient) increased CLB approximately 0.08; a 5° leading edge droop 0.15; and a 5° inboard trailing edge flap 0.12. Analysis of design trends shown by previous experimental results are described for the effects of wing thickness ratio, sweep, aspect ratio, and camber on CLBSpecific buffet problems related to variable swept wings are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wind-tunnel tests of a typical swept wing fighter aircraft were conducted to determine the improvement in the buffet-onset lift coefficient CL^, resulting from wing camber and from leading and trailing edge deflection. The coefficient CLB was determined from trailing edge pressure, wing-root bending moment, fluorescent oil flow photographs, and force data. All four types of data are arranged in a composite graphical form to insure proper CLB selection and to identify the location on the wing where separation first occurs. Results at Mach 0.9 showed that 0.2 increase in camber (airfoil design lift coefficient) increased CLB approximately 0.08; a 5° leading edge droop 0.15; and a 5° inboard trailing edge flap 0.12. Analysis of design trends shown by previous experimental results are described for the effects of wing thickness ratio, sweep, aspect ratio, and camber on CLBSpecific buffet problems related to variable swept wings are discussed.

Key concepts: Wing, Trailing edge, Stall (fluid mechanics), Lift coefficient, Airfoil, Leading edge, Swept wing, Wing loading

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transonic buffet characteristics of a 60-deg swept wing with design variations — Research Paper | ScholarLens