2008•Shiyongjun xuebaoRequires access

Nutritional value of protein from Coprinus comatus fruit bodies cultivated using substrates containing Chamaecrasta nictitans.

LU Cui-xiang, Jiang Zhi-he, Weng Bo-qi

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Coprinus comatus was cultivated on a series of growth substrates in which different amounts of the sawdust component were replaced with Chamaecrasta nictitans.Protein from C.comatus fruit bodies was assessed in terms of six nutritional quality indices - Amino Acid Score (AAS),Chemical Score (CS),Essential Amino Acid Index (EAAI),Biological Value (BV),Nutritional Index (NI) and Amino Acid Ratio Coefficient Score (AARCS).Fruit bodies cultivated using a substrate containing 66.5% sawdust,30% wheat bran,1% sucrose,1% CaCO_3,1% Ca(OH)_2,0.3% KH_2PO_4 and 0.2% MgSO_4 served as controls.The nutritional quality of protein from fruit bodies cultivated on suhstrates containing C.nictitans was superior to protein from controls.Protein from fruit bodies cultivated on a substrate in which the sawdust component had been entirely substituted with C.nictitans was ranked highest in terms of EAAI,BV and NI,second in terms of AAS and AARCS,and had the third-ranked CS value.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Coprinus comatus was cultivated on a series of growth substrates in which different amounts of the sawdust component were replaced with Chamaecrasta nictitans.Protein from C.comatus fruit bodies was assessed in terms of six nutritional quality indices - Amino Acid Score (AAS),Chemical Score (CS),Essential Amino Acid Index (EAAI),Biological Value (BV),Nutritional Index (NI) and Amino Acid Ratio Coefficient Score (AARCS).Fruit bodies cultivated using a substrate containing 66.5% sawdust,30% wheat bran,1% sucrose,1% CaCO_3,1% Ca(OH)_2,0.3% KH_2PO_4 and 0.2% MgSO_4 served as controls.The nutritional quality of protein from fruit bodies cultivated on suhstrates containing C.nictitans was superior to protein from controls.Protein from fruit bodies cultivated on a substrate in which the sawdust component had been entirely substituted with C.nictitans was ranked highest in terms of EAAI,BV and NI,second in terms of AAS and AARCS,and had the third-ranked CS value.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Coprinus comatus was cultivated on a series of growth substrates in which different amounts of the sawdust component were replaced with Chamaecrasta nictitans.Protein from C.comatus fruit bodies was assessed in terms of six nutritional quality indices - Amino Acid Score (AAS),Chemical Score (CS),Essential Amino Acid Index (EAAI),Biological Value (BV),Nutritional Index (NI) and Amino Acid Ratio Coefficient Score (AARCS).Fruit bodies cultivated using a substrate containing 66.5% sawdust,30% wheat bran,1% sucrose,1% CaCO_3,1% Ca(OH)_2,0.3% KH_2PO_4 and 0.2% MgSO_4 served as controls.The nutritional quality of protein from fruit bodies cultivated on suhstrates containing C.nictitans was superior to protein from controls.Protein from fruit bodies cultivated on a substrate in which the sawdust component had been entirely substituted with C.nictitans was ranked highest in terms of EAAI,BV and NI,second in terms of AAS and AARCS,and had the third-ranked CS value.

Key concepts: Essential amino acid, Food science, Bran, Sawdust, Amino acid, Protein quality, Chemistry, Biological value

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nutritional value of protein from Coprinus comatus fruit bodies cultivated using substrates containing Chamaecrasta nictitans. — Research Paper | ScholarLens