2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections - A Balancing Act

Miguel Núñez Cagigal, Joaquin T. Siques

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Balancing the safety and mobility of pedestrians and motorists in an urban environment requires a comprehensive look at the interaction between motorists and pedestrians at signalized intersections. As part of a multifaceted approach to enhancing pedestrian safety at signalized intersections, a study was conducted for the City of Pasadena to assess and improve pedestrian safety at signalized intersections. A toolbox, based on best practices, was developed including physical and operational countermeasures for signalized locations. Operational elements for signalized locations such as peak hour pedestrian recall, leading pedestrian interval, and the scramble phase were included as part of this toolbox. The City has used their toolbox to implement several pedestrian safety treatments at signalized intersections. Combined with an education campaign and increased enforcement, the City has experienced reductions in pedestrian collisions. However, through this process, the City has identified that some measures intended to enhance pedestrian safety can adversely impact intersection operations. For instance, the leading pedestrian interval helps improve pedestrian visibility but it decreases the amount of time available to vehicular movements. Tradeoffs must be considered and studied to determine the effectiveness in achieving a variety of goals in an urban transportation network including level of service, safety, and multimodal integration. This paper will provide a review of the proposed measures and a discussion of methods for further evaluation such as before/after studies and micro-simulation that can be used to get a better understanding of multi-modal operational impacts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Balancing the safety and mobility of pedestrians and motorists in an urban environment requires a comprehensive look at the interaction between motorists and pedestrians at signalized intersections. As part of a multifaceted approach to enhancing pedestrian safety at signalized intersections, a study was conducted for the City of Pasadena to assess and improve pedestrian safety at signalized intersections. A toolbox, based on best practices, was developed including physical and operational countermeasures for signalized locations. Operational elements for signalized locations such as peak hour pedestrian recall, leading pedestrian interval, and the scramble phase were included as part of this toolbox. The City has used their toolbox to implement several pedestrian safety treatments at signalized intersections. Combined with an education campaign and increased enforcement, the City has experienced reductions in pedestrian collisions. However, through this process, the City has identified that some measures intended to enhance pedestrian safety can adversely impact intersection operations. For instance, the leading pedestrian interval helps improve pedestrian visibility but it decreases the amount of time available to vehicular movements. Tradeoffs must be considered and studied to determine the effectiveness in achieving a variety of goals in an urban transportation network including level of service, safety, and multimodal integration. This paper will provide a review of the proposed measures and a discussion of methods for further evaluation such as before/after studies and micro-simulation that can be used to get a better understanding of multi-modal operational impacts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Balancing the safety and mobility of pedestrians and motorists in an urban environment requires a comprehensive look at the interaction between motorists and pedestrians at signalized intersections. As part of a multifaceted approach to enhancing pedestrian safety at signalized intersections, a study was conducted for the City of Pasadena to assess and improve pedestrian safety at signalized intersections. A toolbox, based on best practices, was developed including physical and operational countermeasures for signalized locations. Operational elements for signalized locations such as peak hour pedestrian recall, leading pedestrian interval, and the scramble phase were included as part of this toolbox. The City has used their toolbox to implement several pedestrian safety treatments at signalized intersections. Combined with an education campaign and increased enforcement, the City has experienced reductions in pedestrian collisions. However, through this process, the City has identified that some measures intended to enhance pedestrian safety can adversely impact intersection operations. For instance, the leading pedestrian interval helps improve pedestrian visibility but it decreases the amount of time available to vehicular movements. Tradeoffs must be considered and studied to determine the effectiveness in achieving a variety of goals in an urban transportation network including level of service, safety, and multimodal integration. This paper will provide a review of the proposed measures and a discussion of methods for further evaluation such as before/after studies and micro-simulation that can be used to get a better understanding of multi-modal operational impacts.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Transport engineering, Intersection (aeronautics), Toolbox, Computer science, Process (computing), Visibility, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections - A Balancing Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens