2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

How to remember the Qing Dynasty: The case of Meng Sen

Madeleine Yue Dong

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The historiographical fate of the Qing dynasty remained unclear long after its political doom in 1911. Qing history written by individual authors began to appear after 1911 and continued the style of radical revolutionary history that condemned the Manchus and Qing. The situation began to change with Meng Sen, whose work is considered the highest achievement of the first generation of Qing historians. It is commonly agreed among Chinese historians that Meng Sen was the one who established the field of “ jindai ” (early modern) studies of Qing history. This chapter asks how his kind of professional, or academic, history related itself to official ( zhengshi ) and unofficial ( yeshi ) histories. It focuses on Meng’s reactions to the ban on Qingshi gao (Draft History of the Qing), in particular how he argued for a zhengshi status for it, and his extensive work on yeshi through a method he named kaoshi (examination and correction). Keywords: kaoshi; Meng Sen; Qing dynasty; Qingshi gao ; yeshi ; zhengshi

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The historiographical fate of the Qing dynasty remained unclear long after its political doom in 1911. Qing history written by individual authors began to appear after 1911 and continued the style of radical revolutionary history that condemned the Manchus and Qing. The situation began to change with Meng Sen, whose work is considered the highest achievement of the first generation of Qing historians. It is commonly agreed among Chinese historians that Meng Sen was the one who established the field of “ jindai ” (early modern) studies of Qing history. This chapter asks how his kind of professional, or academic, history related itself to official ( zhengshi ) and unofficial ( yeshi ) histories. It focuses on Meng’s reactions to the ban on Qingshi gao (Draft History of the Qing), in particular how he argued for a zhengshi status for it, and his extensive work on yeshi through a method he named kaoshi (examination and correction). Keywords: kaoshi; Meng Sen; Qing dynasty; Qingshi gao ; yeshi ; zhengshi

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The historiographical fate of the Qing dynasty remained unclear long after its political doom in 1911. Qing history written by individual authors began to appear after 1911 and continued the style of radical revolutionary history that condemned the Manchus and Qing. The situation began to change with Meng Sen, whose work is considered the highest achievement of the first generation of Qing historians. It is commonly agreed among Chinese historians that Meng Sen was the one who established the field of “ jindai ” (early modern) studies of Qing history. This chapter asks how his kind of professional, or academic, history related itself to official ( zhengshi ) and unofficial ( yeshi ) histories. It focuses on Meng’s reactions to the ban on Qingshi gao (Draft History of the Qing), in particular how he argued for a zhengshi status for it, and his extensive work on yeshi through a method he named kaoshi (examination and correction). Keywords: kaoshi; Meng Sen; Qing dynasty; Qingshi gao ; yeshi ; zhengshi

Key concepts: Historiography, Politics, History, History of China, Style (visual arts), Classics, Ancient history, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to remember the Qing Dynasty: The case of Meng Sen — Research Paper | ScholarLens