How to remember the Qing Dynasty: The case of Meng Sen
Madeleine Yue Dong
Abstract
Madeleine Yue Dong
Abstract
The historiographical fate of the Qing dynasty remained unclear long after its political doom in 1911. Qing history written by individual authors began to appear after 1911 and continued the style of radical revolutionary history that condemned the Manchus and Qing. The situation began to change with Meng Sen, whose work is considered the highest achievement of the first generation of Qing historians. It is commonly agreed among Chinese historians that Meng Sen was the one who established the field of “ jindai ” (early modern) studies of Qing history. This chapter asks how his kind of professional, or academic, history related itself to official ( zhengshi ) and unofficial ( yeshi ) histories. It focuses on Meng’s reactions to the ban on Qingshi gao (Draft History of the Qing), in particular how he argued for a zhengshi status for it, and his extensive work on yeshi through a method he named kaoshi (examination and correction). Keywords: kaoshi; Meng Sen; Qing dynasty; Qingshi gao ; yeshi ; zhengshi
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The historiographical fate of the Qing dynasty remained unclear long after its political doom in 1911. Qing history written by individual authors began to appear after 1911 and continued the style of radical revolutionary history that condemned the Manchus and Qing. The situation began to change with Meng Sen, whose work is considered the highest achievement of the first generation of Qing historians. It is commonly agreed among Chinese historians that Meng Sen was the one who established the field of “ jindai ” (early modern) studies of Qing history. This chapter asks how his kind of professional, or academic, history related itself to official ( zhengshi ) and unofficial ( yeshi ) histories. It focuses on Meng’s reactions to the ban on Qingshi gao (Draft History of the Qing), in particular how he argued for a zhengshi status for it, and his extensive work on yeshi through a method he named kaoshi (examination and correction). Keywords: kaoshi; Meng Sen; Qing dynasty; Qingshi gao ; yeshi ; zhengshi
Key concepts: Historiography, Politics, History, History of China, Style (visual arts), Classics, Ancient history, Law