1999Journal of the Japan Society of Blood TransfusionOpen access

Comparison of Two Preparation Methods in Production of Washed Platelet Concentrates.

Dai Sasaki, Satoshi Kosunago, Yoshimitsu Komiyama, Ko Suzuki, Tsukiko Nakano, Tetsuo Shimizu, Tadashi Kamiya, Taka-aki Hiranuma, Shinichi Kora, Katsurou Nishioka, Yasuo Ida

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In Japan, most platelet concentrates (PC) are presently collected by plateletpheresis machines and suspended in autologous plasma. Transfusion of PC occasionally induces non-hemolytic side reactions in thrombocytopenic patients by unknown factors in plasma. To prevent these side effects, removal of autologous plasma from PC has been used with a synthetic medium used for resuspension of platelets. In this study, we compared two methods for washing platelet concentrates (WPC), one by centrifugation to a platelet pellet (P-WPC) and the other using a plateletpheresis machine (CS3000 plus) to non-pelleted platelets (CS-WPC). Both these methods allowed removal of nearly all plasma in PC. Platelet recovery with CS-WPC (98.56%) was greater than that with P-WPC (91.07%). LDH release into the supernatant was lower with CS-WPC than with P-WPC. Platelet discoid ratio and ADP/collagen aggregation in CS-WPC were also greater than those with P-WPC. However, other indicators such as pH, pCO2, PO2, MPV, %HSR, P-selectin release and lactate concentration in the supernatant were not significantly different between the two methods. These results suggest that this new washing method with the CS3000 plus plateletpheresis machine is useful for the preparation of WPC with an acceptable quality of platelets.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In Japan, most platelet concentrates (PC) are presently collected by plateletpheresis machines and suspended in autologous plasma. Transfusion of PC occasionally induces non-hemolytic side reactions in thrombocytopenic patients by unknown factors in plasma. To prevent these side effects, removal of autologous plasma from PC has been used with a synthetic medium used for resuspension of platelets. In this study, we compared two methods for washing platelet concentrates (WPC), one by centrifugation to a platelet pellet (P-WPC) and the other using a plateletpheresis machine (CS3000 plus) to non-pelleted platelets (CS-WPC). Both these methods allowed removal of nearly all plasma in PC. Platelet recovery with CS-WPC (98.56%) was greater than that with P-WPC (91.07%). LDH release into the supernatant was lower with CS-WPC than with P-WPC. Platelet discoid ratio and ADP/collagen aggregation in CS-WPC were also greater than those with P-WPC. However, other indicators such as pH, pCO2, PO2, MPV, %HSR, P-selectin release and lactate concentration in the supernatant were not significantly different between the two methods. These results suggest that this new washing method with the CS3000 plus plateletpheresis machine is useful for the preparation of WPC with an acceptable quality of platelets.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In Japan, most platelet concentrates (PC) are presently collected by plateletpheresis machines and suspended in autologous plasma. Transfusion of PC occasionally induces non-hemolytic side reactions in thrombocytopenic patients by unknown factors in plasma. To prevent these side effects, removal of autologous plasma from PC has been used with a synthetic medium used for resuspension of platelets. In this study, we compared two methods for washing platelet concentrates (WPC), one by centrifugation to a platelet pellet (P-WPC) and the other using a plateletpheresis machine (CS3000 plus) to non-pelleted platelets (CS-WPC). Both these methods allowed removal of nearly all plasma in PC. Platelet recovery with CS-WPC (98.56%) was greater than that with P-WPC (91.07%). LDH release into the supernatant was lower with CS-WPC than with P-WPC. Platelet discoid ratio and ADP/collagen aggregation in CS-WPC were also greater than those with P-WPC. However, other indicators such as pH, pCO2, PO2, MPV, %HSR, P-selectin release and lactate concentration in the supernatant were not significantly different between the two methods. These results suggest that this new washing method with the CS3000 plus plateletpheresis machine is useful for the preparation of WPC with an acceptable quality of platelets.

Key concepts: Plateletpheresis, Platelet, Platelet concentrate, Centrifugation, Chemistry, Chromatography, Platelet-rich plasma, Apheresis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Two Preparation Methods in Production of Washed Platelet Concentrates. — Research Paper | ScholarLens