AESTHETICS FOR SHORT- AND MEDIUM-SPAN BRIDGES. BRIDGE AESTHETICS AROUND THE WORLD
Edward P. Wasserman
Abstract
Edward P. Wasserman
Abstract
Architecture is a highly controversial subject to which each critical observer brings an abundance of preconceptions that burden his objectivity. What pleases one might disturb another. Likewise, aesthetics is not an exact science for which incontrovertible rules can be laid down to ensure universal satisfaction. There are, nonetheless, broad guidelines that form the basis of a consensus of what works and what does not. This paper reviews some of these guidelines for the aesthetic design of short- and medium-span bridges. They concern continuity, proportioning, widening and rehabilitation, and substructures.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Architecture is a highly controversial subject to which each critical observer brings an abundance of preconceptions that burden his objectivity. What pleases one might disturb another. Likewise, aesthetics is not an exact science for which incontrovertible rules can be laid down to ensure universal satisfaction. There are, nonetheless, broad guidelines that form the basis of a consensus of what works and what does not. This paper reviews some of these guidelines for the aesthetic design of short- and medium-span bridges. They concern continuity, proportioning, widening and rehabilitation, and substructures.
Key concepts: Aesthetics, Objectivity (philosophy), Bridge (graph theory), Sociology, Epistemology, Philosophy, Medicine, Internal medicine