1991Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Liberalisation of railroad policy in North America

Curtis M. Grimm, Gordon Rogers

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

A dramatic and fundamental change has occurred in North American railroad policy in recent years. This chapter will detail the changes in policy which have taken place in both the US and Canadian systems of railroad regulation. In short, the main issues are as follows: the Canadian regulatory structure, basically unchanged since the National Transportation Act was passed in 1967, had allowed railroads considerable pricing freedom and contributed to a financially strong and competitive Canadian railroad industry. US railroads, by contrast, were overburdened by an outmoded regulatory framework that had evolved in that country, and found themselves hampered by regulations that were causing them to lose more and more traffic, contributing to a serious deterioration of the country’s entire railroad industry. As a result of pressures to save the industry from total bankruptcy, and coinciding with a general trend towards deregulation of US industry, the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 was passed granting substantial new freedoms to the railroads, including virtually complete pricing flexibility. The result was a move towards more innovative and competitive pricing schemes in the USA, a trend which greatly affected the Canadian railroad industry as well. This ultimately contributed to substantial deregulation in Canada. The following sections of the chapter will provide further details of these developments. We begin with background on US regulation and the movement to deregulation. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A dramatic and fundamental change has occurred in North American railroad policy in recent years. This chapter will detail the changes in policy which have taken place in both the US and Canadian systems of railroad regulation. In short, the main issues are as follows: the Canadian regulatory structure, basically unchanged since the National Transportation Act was passed in 1967, had allowed railroads considerable pricing freedom and contributed to a financially strong and competitive Canadian railroad industry. US railroads, by contrast, were overburdened by an outmoded regulatory framework that had evolved in that country, and found themselves hampered by regulations that were causing them to lose more and more traffic, contributing to a serious deterioration of the country’s entire railroad industry. As a result of pressures to save the industry from total bankruptcy, and coinciding with a general trend towards deregulation of US industry, the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 was passed granting substantial new freedoms to the railroads, including virtually complete pricing flexibility. The result was a move towards more innovative and competitive pricing schemes in the USA, a trend which greatly affected the Canadian railroad industry as well. This ultimately contributed to substantial deregulation in Canada. The following sections of the chapter will provide further details of these developments. We begin with background on US regulation and the movement to deregulation. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A dramatic and fundamental change has occurred in North American railroad policy in recent years. This chapter will detail the changes in policy which have taken place in both the US and Canadian systems of railroad regulation. In short, the main issues are as follows: the Canadian regulatory structure, basically unchanged since the National Transportation Act was passed in 1967, had allowed railroads considerable pricing freedom and contributed to a financially strong and competitive Canadian railroad industry. US railroads, by contrast, were overburdened by an outmoded regulatory framework that had evolved in that country, and found themselves hampered by regulations that were causing them to lose more and more traffic, contributing to a serious deterioration of the country’s entire railroad industry. As a result of pressures to save the industry from total bankruptcy, and coinciding with a general trend towards deregulation of US industry, the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 was passed granting substantial new freedoms to the railroads, including virtually complete pricing flexibility. The result was a move towards more innovative and competitive pricing schemes in the USA, a trend which greatly affected the Canadian railroad industry as well. This ultimately contributed to substantial deregulation in Canada. The following sections of the chapter will provide further details of these developments. We begin with background on US regulation and the movement to deregulation. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Deregulation, Bankruptcy, Liberalization, Flexibility (engineering), Regulatory reform, Business, Competition (biology), Market economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Liberalisation of railroad policy in North America — Research Paper | ScholarLens