1990Unpublished venueRequires access

TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME XI: APPENDIX J - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS

King K. Mak, Roger P Bligh, Wanda L Menges

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of a series of crash tests conducted on existing guardrail systems with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck) in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350. Results of the crash tests indicated that the cable (G1), box-beam (G3), W-beam, strong-wood-post (G4(2W)), and the modified thrie-beam guardrail systems performed satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees). The W-beam, strong-steel post (G4(1S)), and the thrie-beam (G9) guardrail systems failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions. The W-beam, weak-post (G2) guardrail system failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions, but performed satisfactorily under test level 2 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 70 km/h (43.5 mi/h) and 25 degrees). This volume is the eleventh in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of a series of crash tests conducted on existing guardrail systems with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck) in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350. Results of the crash tests indicated that the cable (G1), box-beam (G3), W-beam, strong-wood-post (G4(2W)), and the modified thrie-beam guardrail systems performed satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees). The W-beam, strong-steel post (G4(1S)), and the thrie-beam (G9) guardrail systems failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions. The W-beam, weak-post (G2) guardrail system failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions, but performed satisfactorily under test level 2 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 70 km/h (43.5 mi/h) and 25 degrees). This volume is the eleventh in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of a series of crash tests conducted on existing guardrail systems with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck) in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350. Results of the crash tests indicated that the cable (G1), box-beam (G3), W-beam, strong-wood-post (G4(2W)), and the modified thrie-beam guardrail systems performed satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees). The W-beam, strong-steel post (G4(1S)), and the thrie-beam (G9) guardrail systems failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions. The W-beam, weak-post (G2) guardrail system failed to perform satisfactorily under test level 3 conditions, but performed satisfactorily under test level 2 conditions (i.e., at a nominal impact speed and angle of 70 km/h (43.5 mi/h) and 25 degrees). This volume is the eleventh in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Key concepts: Crash, Crash test, Beam (structure), Structural engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Engineering, Truck, Traffic volume

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME XI: APPENDIX J - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens