1996Unpublished venueRequires access

TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME III: APPENDIX B - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF A GUARDRAIL SYSTEM FOR LOW-FILL CULVERT

King K. Mak, Roger P Bligh, Wanda L Menges

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of three crash tests conducted on long-span nested W-beam guardrail designs for use over culverts. The first test (test no. 471470-2) was on a 3.81-m (12 ft-6 in) span design. The second test (test no. 471470-4) was on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span with a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. The third test (test no. 471470-5) was also on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span, but without a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. All three crash tests corresponded to NCHRP Report 230 test designation 10, involving a 2043-kg (4500-lb) passenger car impacting the guardrail at a nominal impact speed and angle of 96.5 km/h (60 mi/h) and 25 degrees. All three nested W-beam guardrail designs performed satisfactorily in the crash tests and met all evaluation criteria set forth in NCHRP Report 230. This volume is the third in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of three crash tests conducted on long-span nested W-beam guardrail designs for use over culverts. The first test (test no. 471470-2) was on a 3.81-m (12 ft-6 in) span design. The second test (test no. 471470-4) was on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span with a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. The third test (test no. 471470-5) was also on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span, but without a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. All three crash tests corresponded to NCHRP Report 230 test designation 10, involving a 2043-kg (4500-lb) passenger car impacting the guardrail at a nominal impact speed and angle of 96.5 km/h (60 mi/h) and 25 degrees. All three nested W-beam guardrail designs performed satisfactorily in the crash tests and met all evaluation criteria set forth in NCHRP Report 230. This volume is the third in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of three crash tests conducted on long-span nested W-beam guardrail designs for use over culverts. The first test (test no. 471470-2) was on a 3.81-m (12 ft-6 in) span design. The second test (test no. 471470-4) was on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span with a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. The third test (test no. 471470-5) was also on a 5.72-m (18 ft-9 in) span, but without a W-beam rail section on the rear of the guardrail. All three crash tests corresponded to NCHRP Report 230 test designation 10, involving a 2043-kg (4500-lb) passenger car impacting the guardrail at a nominal impact speed and angle of 96.5 km/h (60 mi/h) and 25 degrees. All three nested W-beam guardrail designs performed satisfactorily in the crash tests and met all evaluation criteria set forth in NCHRP Report 230. This volume is the third in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Key concepts: Crash, Crash test, Culvert, Structural engineering, Engineering, Beam (structure), Bridge (graph theory), Span (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME III: APPENDIX B - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF A GUARDRAIL SYSTEM FOR LOW-FILL CULVERT — Research Paper | ScholarLens