1998Unpublished venueRequires access

TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME XIII: APPENDIX L - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED MELT

King K. Mak, Wanda L Menges

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of two crash tests conducted on a modified MELT, with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck), in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for test level 3 conditions. The first test was an end-on test at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 0 degree. The second test was a redirection test at the beginning of length of need at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees. The MELT was judged to have performed satisfactorily on the end-on test, but failed in the redirection test. In the end-on test, the terminal gated and allowed the vehicle to proceed behind the guardrail as designed. In the redirection test, the W-beam rail element ruptured at the post 7 location, which allowed the vehicle to penetrate behind the guardrail. This volume is the thirteenth in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of two crash tests conducted on a modified MELT, with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck), in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for test level 3 conditions. The first test was an end-on test at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 0 degree. The second test was a redirection test at the beginning of length of need at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees. The MELT was judged to have performed satisfactorily on the end-on test, but failed in the redirection test. In the end-on test, the terminal gated and allowed the vehicle to proceed behind the guardrail as designed. In the redirection test, the W-beam rail element ruptured at the post 7 location, which allowed the vehicle to penetrate behind the guardrail. This volume is the thirteenth in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to crash test and evaluate new or modified roadside safety hardware and, where necessary, redesign the devices to improve their impact performance. The three major areas addressed in this study are the impact performance of bridge railings, transitions from guardrails to bridge railings, and end treatments for guardrails and median barriers. This report presents the results of two crash tests conducted on a modified MELT, with the 2000P test vehicle (i.e., a 2000-kg (4409-lb) pickup truck), in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for test level 3 conditions. The first test was an end-on test at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 0 degree. The second test was a redirection test at the beginning of length of need at a nominal impact speed and angle of 100 km/h (62.2 mi/h) and 25 degrees. The MELT was judged to have performed satisfactorily on the end-on test, but failed in the redirection test. In the end-on test, the terminal gated and allowed the vehicle to proceed behind the guardrail as designed. In the redirection test, the W-beam rail element ruptured at the post 7 location, which allowed the vehicle to penetrate behind the guardrail. This volume is the thirteenth in a series of 14 volumes for the final report.

Key concepts: Crash test, Crash, Truck, Bridge (graph theory), Structural engineering, Engineering, Test (biology), Traffic volume

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TESTING OF STATE ROADSIDE SAFETY SYSTEMS. VOLUME XIII: APPENDIX L - CRASH TESTING AND EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED MELT — Research Paper | ScholarLens