1986Unpublished venueRequires access

PARKING MANAGEMENT IN THE BOSTON REGION. AN ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS. CTPS TECHNICAL REPORT 58

Melissa M. Laube, M E Sullivan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Estimates of future fringe parking demand set forth in this report reflect recent increases in commuter rail ridership as well as carpool parking demand. This report presents an analysis of the need for additional commuter parking capacity in the Boston Region and examines potential fringe parking sites for both transit and carpool parking. This report consists of 2 main sections. Section 2 examines characteristics of the demand for fringe parking facilities of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Works. Section 3 presents an analysis of a parking management survey conducted in 99 cities and towns. The survey focuses on the role of parking management at the municipal level. Three communities were recommended as candidates for more detailed parking management case studies. Overall, this study provides some perspective on the nature of the region's parking problems and the magnitude of possible future parking management actions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Estimates of future fringe parking demand set forth in this report reflect recent increases in commuter rail ridership as well as carpool parking demand. This report presents an analysis of the need for additional commuter parking capacity in the Boston Region and examines potential fringe parking sites for both transit and carpool parking. This report consists of 2 main sections. Section 2 examines characteristics of the demand for fringe parking facilities of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Works. Section 3 presents an analysis of a parking management survey conducted in 99 cities and towns. The survey focuses on the role of parking management at the municipal level. Three communities were recommended as candidates for more detailed parking management case studies. Overall, this study provides some perspective on the nature of the region's parking problems and the magnitude of possible future parking management actions.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Estimates of future fringe parking demand set forth in this report reflect recent increases in commuter rail ridership as well as carpool parking demand. This report presents an analysis of the need for additional commuter parking capacity in the Boston Region and examines potential fringe parking sites for both transit and carpool parking. This report consists of 2 main sections. Section 2 examines characteristics of the demand for fringe parking facilities of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Works. Section 3 presents an analysis of a parking management survey conducted in 99 cities and towns. The survey focuses on the role of parking management at the municipal level. Three communities were recommended as candidates for more detailed parking management case studies. Overall, this study provides some perspective on the nature of the region's parking problems and the magnitude of possible future parking management actions.

Key concepts: Carpool, Transport engineering, Public transport, Business, Demand management, Section (typography), Transit (satellite), Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PARKING MANAGEMENT IN THE BOSTON REGION. AN ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS. CTPS TECHNICAL REPORT 58 — Research Paper | ScholarLens