2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Parking Management: Innovative Solutions to Vehicle Parking Problems

Todd Litman

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The author of this article argues that planners’ conventional approaches to parking problems no longer work, and efforts to provide free and abundant parking contradict other planning objectives. The author provides a brief history of how parking standards were created in the past from demand studies performed in automobile-dependent locations. Close to two dozen strategies are identified that encourage more efficient use of parking resources, such as shared parking, more accurate standards, parking maximums, remote parking, and improved pricing methods. The author contends that huge savings can be achieved by reducing parking requirements, and cites Old Pasadena’s downtown area in southern California, Portland, Oregon’s Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, and the Austin Parking Benefit District as examples.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author of this article argues that planners’ conventional approaches to parking problems no longer work, and efforts to provide free and abundant parking contradict other planning objectives. The author provides a brief history of how parking standards were created in the past from demand studies performed in automobile-dependent locations. Close to two dozen strategies are identified that encourage more efficient use of parking resources, such as shared parking, more accurate standards, parking maximums, remote parking, and improved pricing methods. The author contends that huge savings can be achieved by reducing parking requirements, and cites Old Pasadena’s downtown area in southern California, Portland, Oregon’s Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, and the Austin Parking Benefit District as examples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author of this article argues that planners’ conventional approaches to parking problems no longer work, and efforts to provide free and abundant parking contradict other planning objectives. The author provides a brief history of how parking standards were created in the past from demand studies performed in automobile-dependent locations. Close to two dozen strategies are identified that encourage more efficient use of parking resources, such as shared parking, more accurate standards, parking maximums, remote parking, and improved pricing methods. The author contends that huge savings can be achieved by reducing parking requirements, and cites Old Pasadena’s downtown area in southern California, Portland, Oregon’s Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, and the Austin Parking Benefit District as examples.

Key concepts: Parking guidance and information, CITES, Downtown, Transport engineering, Metropolitan area, Work (physics), Parking lot, Car parking

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Parking Management: Innovative Solutions to Vehicle Parking Problems — Research Paper | ScholarLens