1993OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique)Requires access

IMPLICATIONS OF DYNAMIC MODELLING FOR CAR OWNERSHIP AND USE

P B Goodwin, Joyce Dargay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the idea of a dynamic model for car ownership and use, by arguing that the transition from static to dynamic models is of central importance to understanding the market for cars. In theory, dynamic models are more general, and include static models as a special case. Whether their use is worthwhile depends on the interest and importance of their actual results. The authors present some results, based on three sets of analyses: (1) some disaggregated analyses using repeated panel surveys; (2) a summary of recent published results of studies of demand elasticities, using dynamic econometric methods; and (3) a reanalysis, using dynamic specifications, of the type of data used for national road traffic forecasts. The respective findings are as follows. (1) Car ownership is volatile at the individual level, and reductions in car ownership are extensive. (2) The effects of a sustained 10% real increase in fuel price suggest that petrol price manipulation is a more efficient tool for achieving fuel consumption objectives than for controlling congestion. (3) In the long run, car ownership is very sensitive indeed to running costs. The argument is then taken one stage further, by considering the dynamics of car use as well as those of car ownership. This has consequences for traffic congestion, energy consumption, and transport policy in general. There is an appendix on estimation of car ownership and car use models. This paper was presented at the Lex Symposium on Car Marketing Forecasting, held in London on 11 May 1993.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores the idea of a dynamic model for car ownership and use, by arguing that the transition from static to dynamic models is of central importance to understanding the market for cars. In theory, dynamic models are more general, and include static models as a special case. Whether their use is worthwhile depends on the interest and importance of their actual results. The authors present some results, based on three sets of analyses: (1) some disaggregated analyses using repeated panel surveys; (2) a summary of recent published results of studies of demand elasticities, using dynamic econometric methods; and (3) a reanalysis, using dynamic specifications, of the type of data used for national road traffic forecasts. The respective findings are as follows. (1) Car ownership is volatile at the individual level, and reductions in car ownership are extensive. (2) The effects of a sustained 10% real increase in fuel price suggest that petrol price manipulation is a more efficient tool for achieving fuel consumption objectives than for controlling congestion. (3) In the long run, car ownership is very sensitive indeed to running costs. The argument is then taken one stage further, by considering the dynamics of car use as well as those of car ownership. This has consequences for traffic congestion, energy consumption, and transport policy in general. There is an appendix on estimation of car ownership and car use models. This paper was presented at the Lex Symposium on Car Marketing Forecasting, held in London on 11 May 1993.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores the idea of a dynamic model for car ownership and use, by arguing that the transition from static to dynamic models is of central importance to understanding the market for cars. In theory, dynamic models are more general, and include static models as a special case. Whether their use is worthwhile depends on the interest and importance of their actual results. The authors present some results, based on three sets of analyses: (1) some disaggregated analyses using repeated panel surveys; (2) a summary of recent published results of studies of demand elasticities, using dynamic econometric methods; and (3) a reanalysis, using dynamic specifications, of the type of data used for national road traffic forecasts. The respective findings are as follows. (1) Car ownership is volatile at the individual level, and reductions in car ownership are extensive. (2) The effects of a sustained 10% real increase in fuel price suggest that petrol price manipulation is a more efficient tool for achieving fuel consumption objectives than for controlling congestion. (3) In the long run, car ownership is very sensitive indeed to running costs. The argument is then taken one stage further, by considering the dynamics of car use as well as those of car ownership. This has consequences for traffic congestion, energy consumption, and transport policy in general. There is an appendix on estimation of car ownership and car use models. This paper was presented at the Lex Symposium on Car Marketing Forecasting, held in London on 11 May 1993.

Key concepts: Car ownership, Economics, Panel data, Econometrics, Argument (complex analysis), Consumption (sociology), Fuel efficiency, Microeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IMPLICATIONS OF DYNAMIC MODELLING FOR CAR OWNERSHIP AND USE — Research Paper | ScholarLens