2010Railway ageRequires access

Small Roads and Passenger Trains: A Natural Fit?

Roy Blanchard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article uses the examples of the Arkansas & Missouri short line to explore how short lines and regional railroads have opportunities to partner with local communities to balance passenger rail needs with freight business. The author notes that as more cities discover the virtues of passenger rail, they often find area short lines are the cheapest, best, and quickest route. With more investment comes more passenger trains and less capacity to run freight trains, which can lead to higher variable costs for the freight operation. The article also mentions four freight railroads that share track with passenger trains: Amtrak on the New England Central, VIA on the Goderich-Exeter in Ontario, light rail on the San Diego & Imperial Valley, and Dallas’ DART, TRE and DCTA on the Dallas, Garland & Northeastern. The author concludes with a brief discussion of some of the challenges that must be met in order for freight and passenger rail services to successfully share tracks.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article uses the examples of the Arkansas & Missouri short line to explore how short lines and regional railroads have opportunities to partner with local communities to balance passenger rail needs with freight business. The author notes that as more cities discover the virtues of passenger rail, they often find area short lines are the cheapest, best, and quickest route. With more investment comes more passenger trains and less capacity to run freight trains, which can lead to higher variable costs for the freight operation. The article also mentions four freight railroads that share track with passenger trains: Amtrak on the New England Central, VIA on the Goderich-Exeter in Ontario, light rail on the San Diego & Imperial Valley, and Dallas’ DART, TRE and DCTA on the Dallas, Garland & Northeastern. The author concludes with a brief discussion of some of the challenges that must be met in order for freight and passenger rail services to successfully share tracks.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article uses the examples of the Arkansas & Missouri short line to explore how short lines and regional railroads have opportunities to partner with local communities to balance passenger rail needs with freight business. The author notes that as more cities discover the virtues of passenger rail, they often find area short lines are the cheapest, best, and quickest route. With more investment comes more passenger trains and less capacity to run freight trains, which can lead to higher variable costs for the freight operation. The article also mentions four freight railroads that share track with passenger trains: Amtrak on the New England Central, VIA on the Goderich-Exeter in Ontario, light rail on the San Diego & Imperial Valley, and Dallas’ DART, TRE and DCTA on the Dallas, Garland & Northeastern. The author concludes with a brief discussion of some of the challenges that must be met in order for freight and passenger rail services to successfully share tracks.

Key concepts: Train, Transport engineering, Freight trains, Track (disk drive), Passenger train, Passenger transport, Rail freight transport, Investment (military)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Small Roads and Passenger Trains: A Natural Fit? — Research Paper | ScholarLens