Sulfur-burning recommended for precipitator gas conditioning
D.H. Klipstein, Richard S. Atkins
Abstract
D.H. Klipstein, Richard S. Atkins
Abstract
Gas conditioning means injecting small quantities of SO/sub 3/ into the flue gas. This reduces the electrical resistivity of fly ash and makes the dust easier to collect in a precipitator. This makes it possible to increase electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency on fly ash from low-sulfur coal. Several types of commercial SO/sub 3/ gas conditioning systems, i.e., direct injection or evaporation of liquid SO/sub 3/, catalytic conversion of SO/sub 2/, vaporization of sulfuric acid, and sulfur burning followed by the catalytic conversion of SO/sub 2/ to SO/sub 3/, are described. Each system was built and tested, and compared for performance, capital investment, and operating cost. Sulfur-burning is the recommended method for conditioning power plant flue gas to improve electrostatic precipitator performance because: sulfur, being inert, is easily stored and handled; the only location of a corrosion or hazard problem is upstream of the catalytic converter; it has the lowest operating costs, and the capital cost is low and very competitive with the other approaches. (LCL)
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Gas conditioning means injecting small quantities of SO/sub 3/ into the flue gas. This reduces the electrical resistivity of fly ash and makes the dust easier to collect in a precipitator. This makes it possible to increase electrostatic precipitator collection efficiency on fly ash from low-sulfur coal. Several types of commercial SO/sub 3/ gas conditioning systems, i.e., direct injection or evaporation of liquid SO/sub 3/, catalytic conversion of SO/sub 2/, vaporization of sulfuric acid, and sulfur burning followed by the catalytic conversion of SO/sub 2/ to SO/sub 3/, are described. Each system was built and tested, and compared for performance, capital investment, and operating cost. Sulfur-burning is the recommended method for conditioning power plant flue gas to improve electrostatic precipitator performance because: sulfur, being inert, is easily stored and handled; the only location of a corrosion or hazard problem is upstream of the catalytic converter; it has the lowest operating costs, and the capital cost is low and very competitive with the other approaches. (LCL)
Key concepts: Electrostatic precipitator, Flue gas, Waste management, Fly ash, Sulfur, Flue-gas desulfurization, Sulfur trioxide, Coal