1976Public Util. Fortn.; (United States)Requires access

Economics of chemical conditioning for improved precipitator performance

Ira Kukin, H.W. Nelson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The presently preferred method to collect fly ash in coal-burning power plants is through the use of electrostatic precipitators. Precipitators are usually designed to provide high efficiency of collection of fly ash for the particular coals in use and specified at the time of order. Air quality maintenance and improvement regulations are now forcing many power companies to switch from over 2 percent sulfur content coal to low (less than 2 percent) sulfur coal as a means of meeting environmental restrictions on sulfur dioxide emissions. In many cases, this has resulted in deterioration of the precipitator efficiency with the result that particulate emissions exceed the code limits. This discussion focuses, in qualitative and quantitative terms, on means of chemically conditioning low-sulfur coal fly ash to improve its characteristics for better collection in electrostatic precipitators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The presently preferred method to collect fly ash in coal-burning power plants is through the use of electrostatic precipitators. Precipitators are usually designed to provide high efficiency of collection of fly ash for the particular coals in use and specified at the time of order. Air quality maintenance and improvement regulations are now forcing many power companies to switch from over 2 percent sulfur content coal to low (less than 2 percent) sulfur coal as a means of meeting environmental restrictions on sulfur dioxide emissions. In many cases, this has resulted in deterioration of the precipitator efficiency with the result that particulate emissions exceed the code limits. This discussion focuses, in qualitative and quantitative terms, on means of chemically conditioning low-sulfur coal fly ash to improve its characteristics for better collection in electrostatic precipitators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The presently preferred method to collect fly ash in coal-burning power plants is through the use of electrostatic precipitators. Precipitators are usually designed to provide high efficiency of collection of fly ash for the particular coals in use and specified at the time of order. Air quality maintenance and improvement regulations are now forcing many power companies to switch from over 2 percent sulfur content coal to low (less than 2 percent) sulfur coal as a means of meeting environmental restrictions on sulfur dioxide emissions. In many cases, this has resulted in deterioration of the precipitator efficiency with the result that particulate emissions exceed the code limits. This discussion focuses, in qualitative and quantitative terms, on means of chemically conditioning low-sulfur coal fly ash to improve its characteristics for better collection in electrostatic precipitators.

Key concepts: Electrostatic precipitator, Fly ash, Coal, Sulfur dioxide, Waste management, Sulfur trioxide, Environmental science, Particulates

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economics of chemical conditioning for improved precipitator performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens