1997•Unpublished venueRequires access

Cognitive Semantics and Prototype Theory

Dirk Geeraerts

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract With the birth of cognitive semantics, new ideas from the field of theoretical semantics have found their way to the study of meaning changes, and that should not come as a surprise: one of the major things cognitive semantics is interested in is polysemy-and polysemy is, roughly, the synchronic reflection of diachronicsemantic change. As elsewhere in the language, diachrony within synchrony equals variation, and in the present case that means semantic variation. The interest of theoretical semanticists working within the framework of cognitive semantics in the study of meaning changes derives from their interest in polysemy, if only because the synchronic links that exist between the various senses of an item coincide with diachronic mechanisms of semantic extension such as metaphor and metonymy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract With the birth of cognitive semantics, new ideas from the field of theoretical semantics have found their way to the study of meaning changes, and that should not come as a surprise: one of the major things cognitive semantics is interested in is polysemy-and polysemy is, roughly, the synchronic reflection of diachronicsemantic change. As elsewhere in the language, diachrony within synchrony equals variation, and in the present case that means semantic variation. The interest of theoretical semanticists working within the framework of cognitive semantics in the study of meaning changes derives from their interest in polysemy, if only because the synchronic links that exist between the various senses of an item coincide with diachronic mechanisms of semantic extension such as metaphor and metonymy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract With the birth of cognitive semantics, new ideas from the field of theoretical semantics have found their way to the study of meaning changes, and that should not come as a surprise: one of the major things cognitive semantics is interested in is polysemy-and polysemy is, roughly, the synchronic reflection of diachronicsemantic change. As elsewhere in the language, diachrony within synchrony equals variation, and in the present case that means semantic variation. The interest of theoretical semanticists working within the framework of cognitive semantics in the study of meaning changes derives from their interest in polysemy, if only because the synchronic links that exist between the various senses of an item coincide with diachronic mechanisms of semantic extension such as metaphor and metonymy.

Key concepts: Polysemy, Cognitive semantics, Metonymy, Meaning (existential), Semantics (computer science), Linguistics, Metaphor, Extension (predicate logic)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cognitive Semantics and Prototype Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens