2017The Proceedings of the JSME international conference on motion and power transmissionsOpen access

DIFFERENT TEETH PROFILE SHAPES OF POLYMER GEARS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE

Damijan Zorko, Simon Kulovec, Jože Tavčar, Jože Duhovnik

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

The article presents lifespan testing analysis of polymer gears manufactured by cutting. Compared to injection molding, machine cutting provides higher accuracy of gear geometry. Two different tooth flank geometries were tested; i.e. involute and S-gears. In theory S-gears have several advantages over involute gears due to the convex/concave contact between the matching flanks. Theoretical tooth flank geometry of S-gears provides more rolling and less sliding between the matching flanks. The convex/concave contact leads to lower contact stress, which in combination with less sliding means lower losses due to sliding friction and consequently less heat generated. The goal of our research was to prove that tooth flank geometry affects the lifetime of polymer gears, and to find the mechanisms and quantitative differences in the performance of both analyzed geometries. In lifespan testing, the polymer S-gears showed better performance and longer lifespan than involute polymer gears.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article presents lifespan testing analysis of polymer gears manufactured by cutting. Compared to injection molding, machine cutting provides higher accuracy of gear geometry. Two different tooth flank geometries were tested; i.e. involute and S-gears. In theory S-gears have several advantages over involute gears due to the convex/concave contact between the matching flanks. Theoretical tooth flank geometry of S-gears provides more rolling and less sliding between the matching flanks. The convex/concave contact leads to lower contact stress, which in combination with less sliding means lower losses due to sliding friction and consequently less heat generated. The goal of our research was to prove that tooth flank geometry affects the lifetime of polymer gears, and to find the mechanisms and quantitative differences in the performance of both analyzed geometries. In lifespan testing, the polymer S-gears showed better performance and longer lifespan than involute polymer gears.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article presents lifespan testing analysis of polymer gears manufactured by cutting. Compared to injection molding, machine cutting provides higher accuracy of gear geometry. Two different tooth flank geometries were tested; i.e. involute and S-gears. In theory S-gears have several advantages over involute gears due to the convex/concave contact between the matching flanks. Theoretical tooth flank geometry of S-gears provides more rolling and less sliding between the matching flanks. The convex/concave contact leads to lower contact stress, which in combination with less sliding means lower losses due to sliding friction and consequently less heat generated. The goal of our research was to prove that tooth flank geometry affects the lifetime of polymer gears, and to find the mechanisms and quantitative differences in the performance of both analyzed geometries. In lifespan testing, the polymer S-gears showed better performance and longer lifespan than involute polymer gears.

Key concepts: Flank, Involute, Involute gear, Molding (decorative), Regular polygon, Materials science, Pressure angle, Geometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DIFFERENT TEETH PROFILE SHAPES OF POLYMER GEARS AND COMPARISON OF THEIR PERFORMANCE — Research Paper | ScholarLens