Multitude
Paul A. Passavant
Abstract
Paul A. Passavant
Abstract
Abstract Critics of globalization in the 1990s argued that globalization undermined democracy. Whether globalization was understood as something fundamentally new, or as the latest example of imperialist assertions of national interests by strong states in the global system, globalization threatened the sovereignty of the nation‐state. Since democracy in the modern era has been premised on the idea of national self‐determination – the idea that a national people should be self‐governing – the threat that globalization posed to the sovereignty of the nation‐state meant, in turn, a threat to democratic self‐determination; a threat, that is, to democracy.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Critics of globalization in the 1990s argued that globalization undermined democracy. Whether globalization was understood as something fundamentally new, or as the latest example of imperialist assertions of national interests by strong states in the global system, globalization threatened the sovereignty of the nation‐state. Since democracy in the modern era has been premised on the idea of national self‐determination – the idea that a national people should be self‐governing – the threat that globalization posed to the sovereignty of the nation‐state meant, in turn, a threat to democratic self‐determination; a threat, that is, to democracy.
Key concepts: Globalization, Sovereignty, Democracy, Multitude, State (computer science), Political science, Sovereign state, Nation state