2012The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of GlobalizationRequires access

Multitude

Paul A. Passavant

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Critics of globalization in the 1990s argued that globalization undermined democracy. Whether globalization was understood as something fundamentally new, or as the latest example of imperialist assertions of national interests by strong states in the global system, globalization threatened the sovereignty of the nation‐state. Since democracy in the modern era has been premised on the idea of national self‐determination – the idea that a national people should be self‐governing – the threat that globalization posed to the sovereignty of the nation‐state meant, in turn, a threat to democratic self‐determination; a threat, that is, to democracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Critics of globalization in the 1990s argued that globalization undermined democracy. Whether globalization was understood as something fundamentally new, or as the latest example of imperialist assertions of national interests by strong states in the global system, globalization threatened the sovereignty of the nation‐state. Since democracy in the modern era has been premised on the idea of national self‐determination – the idea that a national people should be self‐governing – the threat that globalization posed to the sovereignty of the nation‐state meant, in turn, a threat to democratic self‐determination; a threat, that is, to democracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Critics of globalization in the 1990s argued that globalization undermined democracy. Whether globalization was understood as something fundamentally new, or as the latest example of imperialist assertions of national interests by strong states in the global system, globalization threatened the sovereignty of the nation‐state. Since democracy in the modern era has been premised on the idea of national self‐determination – the idea that a national people should be self‐governing – the threat that globalization posed to the sovereignty of the nation‐state meant, in turn, a threat to democratic self‐determination; a threat, that is, to democracy.

Key concepts: Globalization, Sovereignty, Democracy, Multitude, State (computer science), Political science, Sovereign state, Nation state

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multitude — Research Paper | ScholarLens