2002Unpublished venueOpen access

Practical experiences with standard-cell based datapath design tools. Do we really need regular layouts?

P. Ienne, Alexander Grießing

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Commercial tools for standard-cell based datapath design are here classed according to design flows, and the advantages of each class are discussed with the results of two test circuits. Algorithmic generation of netlists and of relative cell placement can help reducing area but, contrary to common belief appears often detrimental to speed. Extraction of regularity from synthesized netlists is difficult and requires counterproductive simplifications to the synthesis process. Most promising are synthesis tools which can generate placement data; yet, no tool of this class appears ready today.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Commercial tools for standard-cell based datapath design are here classed according to design flows, and the advantages of each class are discussed with the results of two test circuits. Algorithmic generation of netlists and of relative cell placement can help reducing area but, contrary to common belief appears often detrimental to speed. Extraction of regularity from synthesized netlists is difficult and requires counterproductive simplifications to the synthesis process. Most promising are synthesis tools which can generate placement data; yet, no tool of this class appears ready today.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Commercial tools for standard-cell based datapath design are here classed according to design flows, and the advantages of each class are discussed with the results of two test circuits. Algorithmic generation of netlists and of relative cell placement can help reducing area but, contrary to common belief appears often detrimental to speed. Extraction of regularity from synthesized netlists is difficult and requires counterproductive simplifications to the synthesis process. Most promising are synthesis tools which can generate placement data; yet, no tool of this class appears ready today.

Key concepts: Datapath, Computer science, Class (philosophy), Standard cell, Physical design, Process (computing), Computer architecture, Integrated circuit layout

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Practical experiences with standard-cell based datapath design tools. Do we really need regular layouts? — Research Paper | ScholarLens