2006Journal of Scholarly PublishingRequires access

Prestige and the University Press

Steven E. Gump

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The rhetoric of prestige vis-à-vis university presses has taken many forms in the pages of this journal over the last thirty-six years. Two main types of prestige by association are identified in this article: institutional prestige (to host universities) and individual prestige (to authors and administrators at the host institutions). Although ‘manipulating’ prestige may be difficult, holding dear the original mission of university presses may help to strengthen the status and image of university presses, even in times of financial hardship.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The rhetoric of prestige vis-à-vis university presses has taken many forms in the pages of this journal over the last thirty-six years. Two main types of prestige by association are identified in this article: institutional prestige (to host universities) and individual prestige (to authors and administrators at the host institutions). Although ‘manipulating’ prestige may be difficult, holding dear the original mission of university presses may help to strengthen the status and image of university presses, even in times of financial hardship.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The rhetoric of prestige vis-à-vis university presses has taken many forms in the pages of this journal over the last thirty-six years. Two main types of prestige by association are identified in this article: institutional prestige (to host universities) and individual prestige (to authors and administrators at the host institutions). Although ‘manipulating’ prestige may be difficult, holding dear the original mission of university presses may help to strengthen the status and image of university presses, even in times of financial hardship.

Key concepts: Prestige, Rhetoric, Occupational prestige, Sociology, Media studies, Political science, Demography, Theology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prestige and the University Press — Research Paper | ScholarLens