1978ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Open access

The Texas Equal Rights Amendment in the Courts 1972-1977: A Review and Proposed Principles of Interpretation

Rodric Bruce Schoen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article provides a detailed analysis of the 1972 Texas Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The author sets out to explain the current methodology Texas courts use in determining Texas ERA disputes and then suggests a methodology for courts to utilize in future cases. The author first provides an in-depth analysis of thirteen Texas ERA appellate court decisions from 1972 to November 1977. The author believes the courts have not provided enough jurisprudential direction in these cases. In the author’s opinion, the court decisions have not clearly defined the judicial interpretation of the Texas ERA and have left unanswered many of the questions regarding the application of the Texas ERA. The author recognizes that one specific standard of review will not fit the Texas ERA cases. In the final part of the article, the author suggests the courts utilize four principles when deciding future Texas ERA cases. The author provides four hypothetical cases to illustrate his proposed methodology.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article provides a detailed analysis of the 1972 Texas Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The author sets out to explain the current methodology Texas courts use in determining Texas ERA disputes and then suggests a methodology for courts to utilize in future cases. The author first provides an in-depth analysis of thirteen Texas ERA appellate court decisions from 1972 to November 1977. The author believes the courts have not provided enough jurisprudential direction in these cases. In the author’s opinion, the court decisions have not clearly defined the judicial interpretation of the Texas ERA and have left unanswered many of the questions regarding the application of the Texas ERA. The author recognizes that one specific standard of review will not fit the Texas ERA cases. In the final part of the article, the author suggests the courts utilize four principles when deciding future Texas ERA cases. The author provides four hypothetical cases to illustrate his proposed methodology.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article provides a detailed analysis of the 1972 Texas Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The author sets out to explain the current methodology Texas courts use in determining Texas ERA disputes and then suggests a methodology for courts to utilize in future cases. The author first provides an in-depth analysis of thirteen Texas ERA appellate court decisions from 1972 to November 1977. The author believes the courts have not provided enough jurisprudential direction in these cases. In the author’s opinion, the court decisions have not clearly defined the judicial interpretation of the Texas ERA and have left unanswered many of the questions regarding the application of the Texas ERA. The author recognizes that one specific standard of review will not fit the Texas ERA cases. In the final part of the article, the author suggests the courts utilize four principles when deciding future Texas ERA cases. The author provides four hypothetical cases to illustrate his proposed methodology.

Key concepts: Interpretation (philosophy), Amendment, Law, Political science, Constitutional interpretation, Law and economics, Sociology, Constitutional law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Texas Equal Rights Amendment in the Courts 1972-1977: A Review and Proposed Principles of Interpretation — Research Paper | ScholarLens