2008University of North Carolina Press eBooksRequires access

Equal Rights Amendment

Anna R. Hayes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses on Justice Sharp's opposition to the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution in North Carolina—her most famous, least understood, and most resented interference in matters of public policy. Judge Sharp's opposition, largely due to the critical timing of the vote in North Carolina, had a major impact on the failure of the amendment nationally. The ERA struggle spanned roughly twelve years, from 1970 to 1982, encompassing the last nine years of Justice Sharp's service on the North Carolina Supreme Court, four as chief justice, and continuing past her 1979 retirement. First introduced in Congress in 1923, three years after women achieved the right to vote, the ERA had languished for decades. It boiled to the surface in the late 1960s, and the recently formed National Organization for Women (NOW) vowed to fight for its ratification.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter focuses on Justice Sharp's opposition to the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution in North Carolina—her most famous, least understood, and most resented interference in matters of public policy. Judge Sharp's opposition, largely due to the critical timing of the vote in North Carolina, had a major impact on the failure of the amendment nationally. The ERA struggle spanned roughly twelve years, from 1970 to 1982, encompassing the last nine years of Justice Sharp's service on the North Carolina Supreme Court, four as chief justice, and continuing past her 1979 retirement. First introduced in Congress in 1923, three years after women achieved the right to vote, the ERA had languished for decades. It boiled to the surface in the late 1960s, and the recently formed National Organization for Women (NOW) vowed to fight for its ratification.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter focuses on Justice Sharp's opposition to the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the U.S. Constitution in North Carolina—her most famous, least understood, and most resented interference in matters of public policy. Judge Sharp's opposition, largely due to the critical timing of the vote in North Carolina, had a major impact on the failure of the amendment nationally. The ERA struggle spanned roughly twelve years, from 1970 to 1982, encompassing the last nine years of Justice Sharp's service on the North Carolina Supreme Court, four as chief justice, and continuing past her 1979 retirement. First introduced in Congress in 1923, three years after women achieved the right to vote, the ERA had languished for decades. It boiled to the surface in the late 1960s, and the recently formed National Organization for Women (NOW) vowed to fight for its ratification.

Key concepts: Amendment, Political science, Law, Law and economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Equal Rights Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens