1971bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

In Support of the Equal Rights Amendment

Thomas I. Emerson

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The basic premise of the Equal Rights Amendment is that sex shouldnot be a factor in determining the legal rights of women, or of men. Mostof us, I think, agree with this fundamental proposition. For example,virtually everybody would consider it unjust and irrational to provide bylaw that a person could not go to law school or be admitted to the practiceof law because of his or her sex. The reason is that admission to the barought to depend upon legal training, competence in the law, moralcharacter, and similar factors. Some women meet these qualifications andsome do not; some men meet these qualifications and some do not. Butthe issue should be decided on an individual, not a group, basis. The factof maleness or femaleness should be irrelevant. This remains true whetheror not there are more men than women who qualify. It likewise remainstrue even if there be no women who presently qualify, because womenpotentially qualify and might do so under different conditions ofeducation and upbringing. The law, in short, owes an obligation to treatfemales as persons, not statistical abstracts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The basic premise of the Equal Rights Amendment is that sex shouldnot be a factor in determining the legal rights of women, or of men. Mostof us, I think, agree with this fundamental proposition. For example,virtually everybody would consider it unjust and irrational to provide bylaw that a person could not go to law school or be admitted to the practiceof law because of his or her sex. The reason is that admission to the barought to depend upon legal training, competence in the law, moralcharacter, and similar factors. Some women meet these qualifications andsome do not; some men meet these qualifications and some do not. Butthe issue should be decided on an individual, not a group, basis. The factof maleness or femaleness should be irrelevant. This remains true whetheror not there are more men than women who qualify. It likewise remainstrue even if there be no women who presently qualify, because womenpotentially qualify and might do so under different conditions ofeducation and upbringing. The law, in short, owes an obligation to treatfemales as persons, not statistical abstracts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The basic premise of the Equal Rights Amendment is that sex shouldnot be a factor in determining the legal rights of women, or of men. Mostof us, I think, agree with this fundamental proposition. For example,virtually everybody would consider it unjust and irrational to provide bylaw that a person could not go to law school or be admitted to the practiceof law because of his or her sex. The reason is that admission to the barought to depend upon legal training, competence in the law, moralcharacter, and similar factors. Some women meet these qualifications andsome do not; some men meet these qualifications and some do not. Butthe issue should be decided on an individual, not a group, basis. The factof maleness or femaleness should be irrelevant. This remains true whetheror not there are more men than women who qualify. It likewise remainstrue even if there be no women who presently qualify, because womenpotentially qualify and might do so under different conditions ofeducation and upbringing. The law, in short, owes an obligation to treatfemales as persons, not statistical abstracts.

Key concepts: Amendment, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
In Support of the Equal Rights Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens