1998Unpublished venueRequires access

Gaining New Military Capability: An Experiment in Concept Development

John Birkler, C. R. Neu, Glenn A. Kent

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract : In the face of changing operational requirements, expanding technological opportunities, and ever restricted budgets, simply buying more of the same will prove an inadequate strategy for equipping the next generation of military forces, But to make effective use of new technologies to perform changing military tasks, the military must develop new technological and operational concepts for performing a wide range of military operations. Unfortunately, current practice in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) frequently works to limit systematic thinking about alternative approaches to challenging military tasks. Ideally, broad thinking about how specific missions might be accomplished should precede decisions about what kinds of platforms, what classes of technologies, or which military service is most appropriate for particular tasks. Too often, however, these steps in the process of planning force modernization are reversed. As a result, concept development sometimes becomes an exercise in finding a use for a given technology, platform, or operational method rather than in finding the right technology or platform to perform a specific function. Thinking about alternative options is narrowed, and competition among alternative concepts is weakened.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : In the face of changing operational requirements, expanding technological opportunities, and ever restricted budgets, simply buying more of the same will prove an inadequate strategy for equipping the next generation of military forces, But to make effective use of new technologies to perform changing military tasks, the military must develop new technological and operational concepts for performing a wide range of military operations. Unfortunately, current practice in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) frequently works to limit systematic thinking about alternative approaches to challenging military tasks. Ideally, broad thinking about how specific missions might be accomplished should precede decisions about what kinds of platforms, what classes of technologies, or which military service is most appropriate for particular tasks. Too often, however, these steps in the process of planning force modernization are reversed. As a result, concept development sometimes becomes an exercise in finding a use for a given technology, platform, or operational method rather than in finding the right technology or platform to perform a specific function. Thinking about alternative options is narrowed, and competition among alternative concepts is weakened.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : In the face of changing operational requirements, expanding technological opportunities, and ever restricted budgets, simply buying more of the same will prove an inadequate strategy for equipping the next generation of military forces, But to make effective use of new technologies to perform changing military tasks, the military must develop new technological and operational concepts for performing a wide range of military operations. Unfortunately, current practice in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) frequently works to limit systematic thinking about alternative approaches to challenging military tasks. Ideally, broad thinking about how specific missions might be accomplished should precede decisions about what kinds of platforms, what classes of technologies, or which military service is most appropriate for particular tasks. Too often, however, these steps in the process of planning force modernization are reversed. As a result, concept development sometimes becomes an exercise in finding a use for a given technology, platform, or operational method rather than in finding the right technology or platform to perform a specific function. Thinking about alternative options is narrowed, and competition among alternative concepts is weakened.

Key concepts: Function (biology), Process (computing), Modernization theory, Engineering, Service (business), Face (sociological concept), Competition (biology), Risk analysis (engineering)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gaining New Military Capability: An Experiment in Concept Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens