The Future of Military R&D: Towards a Flexible Acquisition Strategy
Paul H. Richanbach, Thomas P. Christie, Ronald A. Finkler, David R. Graham, Frederick R. Riddell
Abstract
Paul H. Richanbach, Thomas P. Christie, Ronald A. Finkler, David R. Graham, Frederick R. Riddell
Abstract
Abstract : The U.S. will have difficulty maintaining its technological superiority for future military systems, due to declining defense budgets, lower levels of production for weapon systems, and great uncertainty regarding future military requirements. What is needed is a military R&D system that generates technological options of sufficient quality and in sufficient numbers so that, in spite of the uncertainty they face, U.S. forces can be fully prepared to meet a wide range of contingencies. The paper explores the attributes of a flexible acquisition strategy, in which numerous options would be explored from basic research (budget category 6.1) through advanced development (6.3A). Programs would enter full development (6.4) less often and more selectively, and not every 6.4 development program would be expected to reach production. The paper recommends and discusses seven actions that are important elements of a flexible acquisition strategy for R&D. DoD should: (1) reaffirm that maintaining superior technological options remains a vital strategic objective, (2) increase funding for science and technology (S&T), (3) treat R&D as a product in its own right, (4) increase the use of prototyping, (5) improve the development of technological options for modifying existing systems, (6) increase the use of commercially available technology, and (7) consider the need for mobilization in weapon system designs.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract : The U.S. will have difficulty maintaining its technological superiority for future military systems, due to declining defense budgets, lower levels of production for weapon systems, and great uncertainty regarding future military requirements. What is needed is a military R&D system that generates technological options of sufficient quality and in sufficient numbers so that, in spite of the uncertainty they face, U.S. forces can be fully prepared to meet a wide range of contingencies. The paper explores the attributes of a flexible acquisition strategy, in which numerous options would be explored from basic research (budget category 6.1) through advanced development (6.3A). Programs would enter full development (6.4) less often and more selectively, and not every 6.4 development program would be expected to reach production. The paper recommends and discusses seven actions that are important elements of a flexible acquisition strategy for R&D. DoD should: (1) reaffirm that maintaining superior technological options remains a vital strategic objective, (2) increase funding for science and technology (S&T), (3) treat R&D as a product in its own right, (4) increase the use of prototyping, (5) improve the development of technological options for modifying existing systems, (6) increase the use of commercially available technology, and (7) consider the need for mobilization in weapon system designs.
Key concepts: Product (mathematics), Quality (philosophy), Production (economics), Weapon system, Risk analysis (engineering), Business, Computer science, Operations management