1983OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Effect of resolution of the Millstone Point Unit 1 Systematic Evaluation Program issues on probabilistic calculations of risk

Robert G. Spulak, D.W. Stack, Paul Amico, Dan Gallagher

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The US NRC Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) identifies deviations from current licensing requirements for older nuclear power plants. The Millstone Point Unit 1 (Millstone-1) plant is the first plant in the SEP which has had a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) performed on it (as part of the Interim Reliability Evaluation Program, IREP). Sandia was requested to calculate the effect on risk of resolving the deviations identified by the SEP for Millstone-1. The results of the IREP Millstone-1 PRA were recalculated incorporating resolution of the issues which were within the scope of the original PRA. Of the 19 issues analyzed in detail, we calculated no reduction in core melt frequency, exposure, and risk for 12 issues, less than 2% reduction for 5 issues, and approx. 15% reduction for 2 interrelated issues if implemented together. These numbers should be viewed in the context of the very large uncertainties in PRA methodology and data. No attempt at cost/benefit analysis was made. The deviations not analyzed were generally those concerning the plant's response to external events such as flooding and earthquakes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The US NRC Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) identifies deviations from current licensing requirements for older nuclear power plants. The Millstone Point Unit 1 (Millstone-1) plant is the first plant in the SEP which has had a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) performed on it (as part of the Interim Reliability Evaluation Program, IREP). Sandia was requested to calculate the effect on risk of resolving the deviations identified by the SEP for Millstone-1. The results of the IREP Millstone-1 PRA were recalculated incorporating resolution of the issues which were within the scope of the original PRA. Of the 19 issues analyzed in detail, we calculated no reduction in core melt frequency, exposure, and risk for 12 issues, less than 2% reduction for 5 issues, and approx. 15% reduction for 2 interrelated issues if implemented together. These numbers should be viewed in the context of the very large uncertainties in PRA methodology and data. No attempt at cost/benefit analysis was made. The deviations not analyzed were generally those concerning the plant's response to external events such as flooding and earthquakes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The US NRC Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) identifies deviations from current licensing requirements for older nuclear power plants. The Millstone Point Unit 1 (Millstone-1) plant is the first plant in the SEP which has had a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) performed on it (as part of the Interim Reliability Evaluation Program, IREP). Sandia was requested to calculate the effect on risk of resolving the deviations identified by the SEP for Millstone-1. The results of the IREP Millstone-1 PRA were recalculated incorporating resolution of the issues which were within the scope of the original PRA. Of the 19 issues analyzed in detail, we calculated no reduction in core melt frequency, exposure, and risk for 12 issues, less than 2% reduction for 5 issues, and approx. 15% reduction for 2 interrelated issues if implemented together. These numbers should be viewed in the context of the very large uncertainties in PRA methodology and data. No attempt at cost/benefit analysis was made. The deviations not analyzed were generally those concerning the plant's response to external events such as flooding and earthquakes.

Key concepts: Probabilistic logic, Probabilistic risk assessment, Context (archaeology), Scope (computer science), Nuclear power plant, Interim, Environmental science, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of resolution of the Millstone Point Unit 1 Systematic Evaluation Program issues on probabilistic calculations of risk — Research Paper | ScholarLens