1992Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Mission Orders: Is Intent the Answer?

Gene C. Kamena

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study investigates U. S. Army doctrine for the commander's intent statement. The inclusion of the commander's intent statement as doctrine is traced from the 1982 version of FM 100-5, Operations, to the present. Current doctrine for the intent statement is not specific enough for commanders in the field; however, emerging U.S. Army doctrine is found to be basically sound. The U.S. Army's emerging doctrine contained in FM 101-5, Staff Organization and Operations, is taught at the Army's Command and General Staff College and is commonly accepted as current doctrine. Rotations at the National Training and the Joint Readiness Training Centers provide data for the research. The actions of subordinate leaders are evaluated to determine to what degree the U.S. Army's doctrine for intent allows freedom of action to subordinates. This study concludes that a properly constructed intent statement facilitates the issuance of mission orders. Research found the most useful intent statements address the purpose of the operation, desired end state, and how to achieve the desired end state. Properly formulated and communicated, the commander’s intent statement is a powerful tool which encourages initiative in subordinates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study investigates U. S. Army doctrine for the commander's intent statement. The inclusion of the commander's intent statement as doctrine is traced from the 1982 version of FM 100-5, Operations, to the present. Current doctrine for the intent statement is not specific enough for commanders in the field; however, emerging U.S. Army doctrine is found to be basically sound. The U.S. Army's emerging doctrine contained in FM 101-5, Staff Organization and Operations, is taught at the Army's Command and General Staff College and is commonly accepted as current doctrine. Rotations at the National Training and the Joint Readiness Training Centers provide data for the research. The actions of subordinate leaders are evaluated to determine to what degree the U.S. Army's doctrine for intent allows freedom of action to subordinates. This study concludes that a properly constructed intent statement facilitates the issuance of mission orders. Research found the most useful intent statements address the purpose of the operation, desired end state, and how to achieve the desired end state. Properly formulated and communicated, the commander’s intent statement is a powerful tool which encourages initiative in subordinates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study investigates U. S. Army doctrine for the commander's intent statement. The inclusion of the commander's intent statement as doctrine is traced from the 1982 version of FM 100-5, Operations, to the present. Current doctrine for the intent statement is not specific enough for commanders in the field; however, emerging U.S. Army doctrine is found to be basically sound. The U.S. Army's emerging doctrine contained in FM 101-5, Staff Organization and Operations, is taught at the Army's Command and General Staff College and is commonly accepted as current doctrine. Rotations at the National Training and the Joint Readiness Training Centers provide data for the research. The actions of subordinate leaders are evaluated to determine to what degree the U.S. Army's doctrine for intent allows freedom of action to subordinates. This study concludes that a properly constructed intent statement facilitates the issuance of mission orders. Research found the most useful intent statements address the purpose of the operation, desired end state, and how to achieve the desired end state. Properly formulated and communicated, the commander’s intent statement is a powerful tool which encourages initiative in subordinates.

Key concepts: Doctrine, Statement (logic), Military doctrine, Political science, Law, Action (physics), Public relations, Management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mission Orders: Is Intent the Answer? — Research Paper | ScholarLens