ScholarLens Back to search
2016•Choice Reviews OnlineRequires access

Interpreting the Constitution

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Preface Acknowledgments Why Another Essay on Constitutional Interpretation and Jucicial Review? Why Should U.S. Society Be Governed by a Constitution? Should the Constitution Evolve or Remain Static? Should the Constitution Evolve by Interpretation or by Amendment Only? Who Should Be the Authoritative Interpreter of the Constitution? What Limits Exist on the Interpretive Process? Is Open-Ended Modernism a Desirable Method of Constitutional Interpretation? Notes Selected Bibliography Index

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preface Acknowledgments Why Another Essay on Constitutional Interpretation and Jucicial Review? Why Should U.S. Society Be Governed by a Constitution? Should the Constitution Evolve or Remain Static? Should the Constitution Evolve by Interpretation or by Amendment Only? Who Should Be the Authoritative Interpreter of the Constitution? What Limits Exist on the Interpretive Process? Is Open-Ended Modernism a Desirable Method of Constitutional Interpretation? Notes Selected Bibliography Index

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preface Acknowledgments Why Another Essay on Constitutional Interpretation and Jucicial Review? Why Should U.S. Society Be Governed by a Constitution? Should the Constitution Evolve or Remain Static? Should the Constitution Evolve by Interpretation or by Amendment Only? Who Should Be the Authoritative Interpreter of the Constitution? What Limits Exist on the Interpretive Process? Is Open-Ended Modernism a Desirable Method of Constitutional Interpretation? Notes Selected Bibliography Index

Key concepts: Constitution, Constitutional interpretation, Interpretation (philosophy), Interpreter, Law, Epistemology, Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interpreting the Constitution — Research Paper | ScholarLens