2017Research and Practice on Chinese MedicinesRequires access

GC-MS Analysis on the Essential Oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with Different Processing Methods

Long Quan-jiang, Xin Jin, Juan Du

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods, study the effect of processing method on the chemical composition. Methods The chemical composition of essential oil were analyzed by GC-MS. Results 30 components were identified in essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with two processing methods, including 25 components in fresh-cut processed Zingiberis Rhizoma and 11 components in traditional processed Zingiberis Rhizoma. There were high content of eudesmol, 5-(1, 5-dimethyl-4-hexene)-2-methyl-[S-(R~*, S~*)]-1,3-cyclohexadiene, camphene in fresh-cut processed samples and eudesmol, camphene, isoborneol in traditional processed samples, reached to 29.10%, 14.12%, 12.68% and 47.35%, 20.01%, 14.26%, respectively. The quantity and quality of chemical composition in essential oil had significant difference between different processing methods. Conclusion It provided experimental basis for quality evaluation of Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods, study the effect of processing method on the chemical composition. Methods The chemical composition of essential oil were analyzed by GC-MS. Results 30 components were identified in essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with two processing methods, including 25 components in fresh-cut processed Zingiberis Rhizoma and 11 components in traditional processed Zingiberis Rhizoma. There were high content of eudesmol, 5-(1, 5-dimethyl-4-hexene)-2-methyl-[S-(R~*, S~*)]-1,3-cyclohexadiene, camphene in fresh-cut processed samples and eudesmol, camphene, isoborneol in traditional processed samples, reached to 29.10%, 14.12%, 12.68% and 47.35%, 20.01%, 14.26%, respectively. The quantity and quality of chemical composition in essential oil had significant difference between different processing methods. Conclusion It provided experimental basis for quality evaluation of Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods, study the effect of processing method on the chemical composition. Methods The chemical composition of essential oil were analyzed by GC-MS. Results 30 components were identified in essential oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with two processing methods, including 25 components in fresh-cut processed Zingiberis Rhizoma and 11 components in traditional processed Zingiberis Rhizoma. There were high content of eudesmol, 5-(1, 5-dimethyl-4-hexene)-2-methyl-[S-(R~*, S~*)]-1,3-cyclohexadiene, camphene in fresh-cut processed samples and eudesmol, camphene, isoborneol in traditional processed samples, reached to 29.10%, 14.12%, 12.68% and 47.35%, 20.01%, 14.26%, respectively. The quantity and quality of chemical composition in essential oil had significant difference between different processing methods. Conclusion It provided experimental basis for quality evaluation of Zingiberis Rhizoma with different processing methods.

Key concepts: Camphene, Essential oil, Significant difference, Chemistry, Chromatography, Medicine, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GC-MS Analysis on the Essential Oil from Zingiberis Rhizoma with Different Processing Methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens