2014The Journal Of Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsRequires access

Original Articles : Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery

Young Kyun Kim, Pil Young Yun

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR)in dental implant surgery. Methods: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital(Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications relatedto dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-relatedfactors and material-related factors, were evaluated. Results: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considereda major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). Inthe main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the externalconnection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the differencewas not significant (P =0.100). Conclusion: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wounddehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscenceis recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR)in dental implant surgery. Methods: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital(Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications relatedto dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-relatedfactors and material-related factors, were evaluated. Results: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considereda major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). Inthe main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the externalconnection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the differencewas not significant (P =0.100). Conclusion: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wounddehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscenceis recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR)in dental implant surgery. Methods: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital(Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications relatedto dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-relatedfactors and material-related factors, were evaluated. Results: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considereda major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). Inthe main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the externalconnection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the differencewas not significant (P =0.100). Conclusion: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wounddehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscenceis recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence.

Key concepts: Dehiscence, Medicine, Wound dehiscence, Odds ratio, Dentistry, Surgery, Implant, Dental implant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Original Articles : Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens