2016Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical ImplantsRequires access

Radiographic Evaluation of Bone-Level Implants with Wound Dehiscence between the First- and Second-Stage Surgeries

Sara Soheilifar, Mohsen Bidgoli, Erfan Abbasi Atibeh, Javad Faradmal

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most common complications of implant surgery is wound dehiscence followed by exposure of the implant to the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to radiographically analyze crestal bone loss around bone-level implants with wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries. METHODS: The records of 136 implants inserted during 2013-2014 were evaluated. Patients with no history of systemic disease, drug addiction, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were selected. Forty-eight implants had cover screws with complete or partial exposure to the oral cavity after the suture removal and before the second surgery. Digital or normal radiographs were taken after the first and during the second surgery and the distance between the implant shoulder and proximal bone crest was measured on the radiographs by 3 calibrated blinded examiners using a digital caliper. RESULTS: The mean amounts of bone loss around the exposed and nonexposed implants were 0.46 ± 0.55 and 0.32 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries may increase crestal bone loss in some cases but can be reduced by professional follow-ups and antibacterial treatments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: One of the most common complications of implant surgery is wound dehiscence followed by exposure of the implant to the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to radiographically analyze crestal bone loss around bone-level implants with wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries. METHODS: The records of 136 implants inserted during 2013-2014 were evaluated. Patients with no history of systemic disease, drug addiction, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were selected. Forty-eight implants had cover screws with complete or partial exposure to the oral cavity after the suture removal and before the second surgery. Digital or normal radiographs were taken after the first and during the second surgery and the distance between the implant shoulder and proximal bone crest was measured on the radiographs by 3 calibrated blinded examiners using a digital caliper. RESULTS: The mean amounts of bone loss around the exposed and nonexposed implants were 0.46 ± 0.55 and 0.32 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries may increase crestal bone loss in some cases but can be reduced by professional follow-ups and antibacterial treatments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most common complications of implant surgery is wound dehiscence followed by exposure of the implant to the oral cavity. The aim of this study was to radiographically analyze crestal bone loss around bone-level implants with wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries. METHODS: The records of 136 implants inserted during 2013-2014 were evaluated. Patients with no history of systemic disease, drug addiction, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy were selected. Forty-eight implants had cover screws with complete or partial exposure to the oral cavity after the suture removal and before the second surgery. Digital or normal radiographs were taken after the first and during the second surgery and the distance between the implant shoulder and proximal bone crest was measured on the radiographs by 3 calibrated blinded examiners using a digital caliper. RESULTS: The mean amounts of bone loss around the exposed and nonexposed implants were 0.46 ± 0.55 and 0.32 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Wound dehiscence between the first- and second-stage surgeries may increase crestal bone loss in some cases but can be reduced by professional follow-ups and antibacterial treatments.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiography, Dehiscence, Stage (stratigraphy), Dentistry, Wound dehiscence, Surgery, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Radiographic Evaluation of Bone-Level Implants with Wound Dehiscence between the First- and Second-Stage Surgeries — Research Paper | ScholarLens