2011Clinical Oral Implants ResearchRequires access

Immediate implant placement in molar regions: risk factors for early failure

Thomas Urban, Lambros Kostopoulos, Ann Wenzel

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for early failure of immediately placed implants in molar regions associated with three bone regenerative techniques. METHODS: Ninety-two patients (44 women and 48 men; mean age 50 years, 35 smokers and 57 non-smokers) in need of a single implant crown to replace a molar were included. After placing the implant, patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups for bone reconstruction of remaining periimplant defects: Autologous bone (AB) chips, Ossix membrane (OM) or a combination of AB chips and OM. The implant was submerged, and after 4 months of healing a re-entry surgery was made to connect a healing abutment. Implants with a dehiscence on ≥2 sites (mesial/distal/oral/buccal) together with ≥50% visible threads, were judged as failures. A series of simple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for failure among the following independent variables: sex, jaw, smoking status, plaque, bleeding on probing, fistula, extraction reason, mean initial periimplant defect size, treatment group, implant length, buccal bone dehiscence (BBD), soft-tissue dehiscence and infection. The identified risk factors entered a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen implants failed before abutment operation (13 explantations/two non-osseointegrated). Treatment group had no impact on failure. Risk factors for failure were: Smoking >10 cigarettes/day (odds ratio [OR]=9.29, confidence interval [CI]=1.21-71.16), BBD (OR=11.43, CI=1.34-97.74) and infection (OR=36.7, CI=2.75-489.31). CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed immediately after extraction of a molar were associated with a high risk for failure at abutment operation. There was no difference in failure rate between three bone reconstructive techniques.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for early failure of immediately placed implants in molar regions associated with three bone regenerative techniques. METHODS: Ninety-two patients (44 women and 48 men; mean age 50 years, 35 smokers and 57 non-smokers) in need of a single implant crown to replace a molar were included. After placing the implant, patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups for bone reconstruction of remaining periimplant defects: Autologous bone (AB) chips, Ossix membrane (OM) or a combination of AB chips and OM. The implant was submerged, and after 4 months of healing a re-entry surgery was made to connect a healing abutment. Implants with a dehiscence on ≥2 sites (mesial/distal/oral/buccal) together with ≥50% visible threads, were judged as failures. A series of simple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for failure among the following independent variables: sex, jaw, smoking status, plaque, bleeding on probing, fistula, extraction reason, mean initial periimplant defect size, treatment group, implant length, buccal bone dehiscence (BBD), soft-tissue dehiscence and infection. The identified risk factors entered a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen implants failed before abutment operation (13 explantations/two non-osseointegrated). Treatment group had no impact on failure. Risk factors for failure were: Smoking >10 cigarettes/day (odds ratio [OR]=9.29, confidence interval [CI]=1.21-71.16), BBD (OR=11.43, CI=1.34-97.74) and infection (OR=36.7, CI=2.75-489.31). CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed immediately after extraction of a molar were associated with a high risk for failure at abutment operation. There was no difference in failure rate between three bone reconstructive techniques.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for early failure of immediately placed implants in molar regions associated with three bone regenerative techniques. METHODS: Ninety-two patients (44 women and 48 men; mean age 50 years, 35 smokers and 57 non-smokers) in need of a single implant crown to replace a molar were included. After placing the implant, patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups for bone reconstruction of remaining periimplant defects: Autologous bone (AB) chips, Ossix membrane (OM) or a combination of AB chips and OM. The implant was submerged, and after 4 months of healing a re-entry surgery was made to connect a healing abutment. Implants with a dehiscence on ≥2 sites (mesial/distal/oral/buccal) together with ≥50% visible threads, were judged as failures. A series of simple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for failure among the following independent variables: sex, jaw, smoking status, plaque, bleeding on probing, fistula, extraction reason, mean initial periimplant defect size, treatment group, implant length, buccal bone dehiscence (BBD), soft-tissue dehiscence and infection. The identified risk factors entered a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen implants failed before abutment operation (13 explantations/two non-osseointegrated). Treatment group had no impact on failure. Risk factors for failure were: Smoking >10 cigarettes/day (odds ratio [OR]=9.29, confidence interval [CI]=1.21-71.16), BBD (OR=11.43, CI=1.34-97.74) and infection (OR=36.7, CI=2.75-489.31). CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed immediately after extraction of a molar were associated with a high risk for failure at abutment operation. There was no difference in failure rate between three bone reconstructive techniques.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dentistry, Osseointegration, Implant, Dehiscence, Odds ratio, Confidence interval, Molar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immediate implant placement in molar regions: risk factors for early failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens