Same grammar or different grammar? Contrasting approaches to the grammar of spoken English discourse
Geoffrey Leech
Abstract
Geoffrey Leech
Abstract
This chapter describes the two approach namely: &s;same grammar&s; and &s;different grammar&s;, together with the third &s;in-between" model of the Nottingham School. It explains the study of English grammar; a justifiable tendency has been to propose that a completely fresh look at grammar is needed when one turns to examine the grammatical characteristics of speech. The chapter explores that the corpus-oriented description of spoken grammar &s;in its own terms&s;, as by David Brazil and the Nottingham School, is a valuable corrective to the tradition whereby the grammar of spoken discourse is described in terms of a framework informed primarily by written language use. It discusses that the analysis of a general corpus representative of spoken and written language is a corrective to the description of spoken grammar &s;in its own terms&s;: the general corpus enables us to provide a contrastive &s;frequency map&s; of the language, showing where spoken grammar differs significantly from written grammar.
OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter describes the two approach namely: &s;same grammar&s; and &s;different grammar&s;, together with the third &s;in-between" model of the Nottingham School. It explains the study of English grammar; a justifiable tendency has been to propose that a completely fresh look at grammar is needed when one turns to examine the grammatical characteristics of speech. The chapter explores that the corpus-oriented description of spoken grammar &s;in its own terms&s;, as by David Brazil and the Nottingham School, is a valuable corrective to the tradition whereby the grammar of spoken discourse is described in terms of a framework informed primarily by written language use. It discusses that the analysis of a general corpus representative of spoken and written language is a corrective to the description of spoken grammar &s;in its own terms&s;: the general corpus enables us to provide a contrastive &s;frequency map&s; of the language, showing where spoken grammar differs significantly from written grammar.
Key concepts: Linguistics, Grammar, Emergent grammar, Generative grammar, Computer science, Head-driven phrase structure grammar, English grammar, Relational grammar