2021•Open Access Journals at Oslo Metropolitan University (Oslo Metropolitan University)Open access

Escaping the Dark Side of Technology via Subject-ness: Sustainable Technology Education and Holistic Craft

Jan Varpanen

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The widening role of (digital) technology in our societies and the global ecological crisis are certainly two of the most prominent educational challenges of our time. Moreover, the intricate relationship between the two introduces tensions in pedagogical practice. Veli-Matti Värri, for example, has presented the Heideggerian argument that technology leads us into the kind of calculative thinking that underlies the destructive relationship between human beings and the more-than-human world. If this argument is correct, education for sustainability would be education out of technology instead of education about technology. The following question arises: How can technology education be education for sustainability? With the help of Gert Biesta’s concept of subjectification as being spoken to by something in the world, I develop the idea that technology education can be sustainability education if it allows children to encounter the essence of technology. I then argue that holistic craft is a pedagogical method that, under certain parameters, can help to realize this possibility. In order to make these philosophical ideas more concrete and to outline what this could mean in practice, I turn to an example drawn from a collaborative project between a pre-school and a primary school. From the interplay of educational theory and the practical example, I draw the conclusion that the combination of craft and reflection proper to the holistic craft process offers children possibilities for being sustainably with technology.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The widening role of (digital) technology in our societies and the global ecological crisis are certainly two of the most prominent educational challenges of our time. Moreover, the intricate relationship between the two introduces tensions in pedagogical practice. Veli-Matti Värri, for example, has presented the Heideggerian argument that technology leads us into the kind of calculative thinking that underlies the destructive relationship between human beings and the more-than-human world. If this argument is correct, education for sustainability would be education out of technology instead of education about technology. The following question arises: How can technology education be education for sustainability? With the help of Gert Biesta’s concept of subjectification as being spoken to by something in the world, I develop the idea that technology education can be sustainability education if it allows children to encounter the essence of technology. I then argue that holistic craft is a pedagogical method that, under certain parameters, can help to realize this possibility. In order to make these philosophical ideas more concrete and to outline what this could mean in practice, I turn to an example drawn from a collaborative project between a pre-school and a primary school. From the interplay of educational theory and the practical example, I draw the conclusion that the combination of craft and reflection proper to the holistic craft process offers children possibilities for being sustainably with technology.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The widening role of (digital) technology in our societies and the global ecological crisis are certainly two of the most prominent educational challenges of our time. Moreover, the intricate relationship between the two introduces tensions in pedagogical practice. Veli-Matti Värri, for example, has presented the Heideggerian argument that technology leads us into the kind of calculative thinking that underlies the destructive relationship between human beings and the more-than-human world. If this argument is correct, education for sustainability would be education out of technology instead of education about technology. The following question arises: How can technology education be education for sustainability? With the help of Gert Biesta’s concept of subjectification as being spoken to by something in the world, I develop the idea that technology education can be sustainability education if it allows children to encounter the essence of technology. I then argue that holistic craft is a pedagogical method that, under certain parameters, can help to realize this possibility. In order to make these philosophical ideas more concrete and to outline what this could mean in practice, I turn to an example drawn from a collaborative project between a pre-school and a primary school. From the interplay of educational theory and the practical example, I draw the conclusion that the combination of craft and reflection proper to the holistic craft process offers children possibilities for being sustainably with technology.

Key concepts: Craft, Argument (complex analysis), Sustainability, Sociology, Technology education, Epistemology, Subjectification, Subject (documents)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Escaping the Dark Side of Technology via Subject-ness: Sustainable Technology Education and Holistic Craft — Research Paper | ScholarLens