2012•Visible LanguageOpen access

Learn from the Core--Design from the Core.

Thomas Ockerse

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current objective, object-oriented approach to design is questioned along with design education viewed as a job-oriented endeavor. Instead relational knowledge and experience in a holistic sense, both tacit and explicit, are valued along with an appreciation of unique character of student. A new paradigm for design education is proposed that embraces collaboration and focuses on integration of study, experience and reflection that translates beyond design into an intelligent life. EDUCATOR AND ACTIVIST, Parker Palmer claims: We are being called upon into a more paradoxical wholeness of knowing by many voices. There is a new community of scholars in a variety of fields now who understand that genuine knowing comes out of a healthy dance between objective and subjective, between analytic and integrative, between experimental and what I would call receptive.1 In same book, co-author Arthur Zajonc adds: The curricula offered by our institutions of higher education have largely neglected this central, if profoundly difficult task of learning to love, which is also task of learning to live in true peace and harmony with others and with nature. These statements reflect paradigm shiftfrom mechanistic Cartesian worldview (the world as a collection of objects) to a holistic, ecological view of reality as a shiftin consciousness from objects to relationships. In this new perception of reality properties of parts are intrinsic properties, but can only be understood as merely a pattern in an inseparable, integrative and dynamic web of relationships. Realizing this shiftis central to all our perceptions, and therefore to our future of design as a field of practice, and most significantly, central to design education. For education, this means nothing less than a call for total transformation: to establish an emancipating environment that facilitates a process that awakens capacities of whole person for all participants in that community: students, faculty and staff. As Wendell Berry declared in 1987: The thing being made in a university is humanity ... (as) responsible heirs and members of human culture.2 This transformation requires attention to what Dalai Lama calls the secular ethics of heart. . . . stu! most educators tend to dismiss as being outside territory of course subject, while faculty declare that this is not our business. Education and design are now at this very threshold of change. They thrive on their interdependence, just as they have throughout their evolutions. I envision respective fields to change significantly in future-as they must if either is worth its salt regarding its contributions to world and humanity's stewardship to its planet called home. In 2003 icograda education team was asked to respond to question: What can education offer that will truly sustain students in life? As an invited contributor my response was, in a nutshell: students need a process that helps them cultivate their intelligence to become truly integrated individuals capable of dealing with life as a whole - as human beings foremost - and only then as designers. I view this nurturing of intelligence as central task for educators, their primary purpose. That we happen to do this via design is useful, but secondary. For education this is at heart of word sustainability. For what ultimately sustains us only comes from our inner capacities that arise from core or our heart of being-not from some external source or authority. Contemporary western education, with its tradition so firmly established since Aristotle, is a system based on comparison and competition. Its main interest is to multiply knowledge and facts and to develop intellectual skills and clever minds. That system perpetuates materialism and fragmentation as way to view world, which only proliferates current state of our world. …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The current objective, object-oriented approach to design is questioned along with design education viewed as a job-oriented endeavor. Instead relational knowledge and experience in a holistic sense, both tacit and explicit, are valued along with an appreciation of unique character of student. A new paradigm for design education is proposed that embraces collaboration and focuses on integration of study, experience and reflection that translates beyond design into an intelligent life. EDUCATOR AND ACTIVIST, Parker Palmer claims: We are being called upon into a more paradoxical wholeness of knowing by many voices. There is a new community of scholars in a variety of fields now who understand that genuine knowing comes out of a healthy dance between objective and subjective, between analytic and integrative, between experimental and what I would call receptive.1 In same book, co-author Arthur Zajonc adds: The curricula offered by our institutions of higher education have largely neglected this central, if profoundly difficult task of learning to love, which is also task of learning to live in true peace and harmony with others and with nature. These statements reflect paradigm shiftfrom mechanistic Cartesian worldview (the world as a collection of objects) to a holistic, ecological view of reality as a shiftin consciousness from objects to relationships. In this new perception of reality properties of parts are intrinsic properties, but can only be understood as merely a pattern in an inseparable, integrative and dynamic web of relationships. Realizing this shiftis central to all our perceptions, and therefore to our future of design as a field of practice, and most significantly, central to design education. For education, this means nothing less than a call for total transformation: to establish an emancipating environment that facilitates a process that awakens capacities of whole person for all participants in that community: students, faculty and staff. As Wendell Berry declared in 1987: The thing being made in a university is humanity ... (as) responsible heirs and members of human culture.2 This transformation requires attention to what Dalai Lama calls the secular ethics of heart. . . . stu! most educators tend to dismiss as being outside territory of course subject, while faculty declare that this is not our business. Education and design are now at this very threshold of change. They thrive on their interdependence, just as they have throughout their evolutions. I envision respective fields to change significantly in future-as they must if either is worth its salt regarding its contributions to world and humanity's stewardship to its planet called home. In 2003 icograda education team was asked to respond to question: What can education offer that will truly sustain students in life? As an invited contributor my response was, in a nutshell: students need a process that helps them cultivate their intelligence to become truly integrated individuals capable of dealing with life as a whole - as human beings foremost - and only then as designers. I view this nurturing of intelligence as central task for educators, their primary purpose. That we happen to do this via design is useful, but secondary. For education this is at heart of word sustainability. For what ultimately sustains us only comes from our inner capacities that arise from core or our heart of being-not from some external source or authority. Contemporary western education, with its tradition so firmly established since Aristotle, is a system based on comparison and competition. Its main interest is to multiply knowledge and facts and to develop intellectual skills and clever minds. That system perpetuates materialism and fragmentation as way to view world, which only proliferates current state of our world. …

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The current objective, object-oriented approach to design is questioned along with design education viewed as a job-oriented endeavor. Instead relational knowledge and experience in a holistic sense, both tacit and explicit, are valued along with an appreciation of unique character of student. A new paradigm for design education is proposed that embraces collaboration and focuses on integration of study, experience and reflection that translates beyond design into an intelligent life. EDUCATOR AND ACTIVIST, Parker Palmer claims: We are being called upon into a more paradoxical wholeness of knowing by many voices. There is a new community of scholars in a variety of fields now who understand that genuine knowing comes out of a healthy dance between objective and subjective, between analytic and integrative, between experimental and what I would call receptive.1 In same book, co-author Arthur Zajonc adds: The curricula offered by our institutions of higher education have largely neglected this central, if profoundly difficult task of learning to love, which is also task of learning to live in true peace and harmony with others and with nature. These statements reflect paradigm shiftfrom mechanistic Cartesian worldview (the world as a collection of objects) to a holistic, ecological view of reality as a shiftin consciousness from objects to relationships. In this new perception of reality properties of parts are intrinsic properties, but can only be understood as merely a pattern in an inseparable, integrative and dynamic web of relationships. Realizing this shiftis central to all our perceptions, and therefore to our future of design as a field of practice, and most significantly, central to design education. For education, this means nothing less than a call for total transformation: to establish an emancipating environment that facilitates a process that awakens capacities of whole person for all participants in that community: students, faculty and staff. As Wendell Berry declared in 1987: The thing being made in a university is humanity ... (as) responsible heirs and members of human culture.2 This transformation requires attention to what Dalai Lama calls the secular ethics of heart. . . . stu! most educators tend to dismiss as being outside territory of course subject, while faculty declare that this is not our business. Education and design are now at this very threshold of change. They thrive on their interdependence, just as they have throughout their evolutions. I envision respective fields to change significantly in future-as they must if either is worth its salt regarding its contributions to world and humanity's stewardship to its planet called home. In 2003 icograda education team was asked to respond to question: What can education offer that will truly sustain students in life? As an invited contributor my response was, in a nutshell: students need a process that helps them cultivate their intelligence to become truly integrated individuals capable of dealing with life as a whole - as human beings foremost - and only then as designers. I view this nurturing of intelligence as central task for educators, their primary purpose. That we happen to do this via design is useful, but secondary. For education this is at heart of word sustainability. For what ultimately sustains us only comes from our inner capacities that arise from core or our heart of being-not from some external source or authority. Contemporary western education, with its tradition so firmly established since Aristotle, is a system based on comparison and competition. Its main interest is to multiply knowledge and facts and to develop intellectual skills and clever minds. That system perpetuates materialism and fragmentation as way to view world, which only proliferates current state of our world. …

Key concepts: Consciousness, Harmony (color), Variety (cybernetics), Sociology, Perception, Epistemology, Psychology, Cognitive science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Learn from the Core--Design from the Core. — Research Paper | ScholarLens