2021PerspectivesRequires access

Translating Marxism as a philosophy of modernity in China: the case of the Manifesto of the Communist Party

Yangsheng Guo

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Marxism found its way to China when the nation was struggling for a way out of semi-feudalism and semi-colonialism into a brighter future envisioned by Marx. Over a century’s textual and extratextual translation of the Manifesto demonstrates various dimensions of modernity at work, particularly the contradiction between the pre-modern Classical Chinese and a modernized language that translating the Manifesto requires, as well as socio-economic, political and cultural differences between China and Europe, where the Manifesto originated. The process of constantly retranslating the pamphlet constitutes a trajectory of China’s mega transition into a modern(izing) society in terms of language that is reflective of the economic base vs. the superstructure, and domestic and international socio-economic and political changes. It points to the unfinishability of modernity in translation, and the need to move away from ideological constraints and restraints to a more shared vision of modernity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Marxism found its way to China when the nation was struggling for a way out of semi-feudalism and semi-colonialism into a brighter future envisioned by Marx. Over a century’s textual and extratextual translation of the Manifesto demonstrates various dimensions of modernity at work, particularly the contradiction between the pre-modern Classical Chinese and a modernized language that translating the Manifesto requires, as well as socio-economic, political and cultural differences between China and Europe, where the Manifesto originated. The process of constantly retranslating the pamphlet constitutes a trajectory of China’s mega transition into a modern(izing) society in terms of language that is reflective of the economic base vs. the superstructure, and domestic and international socio-economic and political changes. It points to the unfinishability of modernity in translation, and the need to move away from ideological constraints and restraints to a more shared vision of modernity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Marxism found its way to China when the nation was struggling for a way out of semi-feudalism and semi-colonialism into a brighter future envisioned by Marx. Over a century’s textual and extratextual translation of the Manifesto demonstrates various dimensions of modernity at work, particularly the contradiction between the pre-modern Classical Chinese and a modernized language that translating the Manifesto requires, as well as socio-economic, political and cultural differences between China and Europe, where the Manifesto originated. The process of constantly retranslating the pamphlet constitutes a trajectory of China’s mega transition into a modern(izing) society in terms of language that is reflective of the economic base vs. the superstructure, and domestic and international socio-economic and political changes. It points to the unfinishability of modernity in translation, and the need to move away from ideological constraints and restraints to a more shared vision of modernity.

Key concepts: Manifesto, Modernity, Communism, Ideology, Politics, China, Sociology, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Translating Marxism as a philosophy of modernity in China: the case of the Manifesto of the Communist Party — Research Paper | ScholarLens