Translating Marxism as a philosophy of modernity in China: the case of the Manifesto of the Communist Party
Yangsheng Guo
Abstract
Yangsheng Guo
Abstract
Marxism found its way to China when the nation was struggling for a way out of semi-feudalism and semi-colonialism into a brighter future envisioned by Marx. Over a century’s textual and extratextual translation of the Manifesto demonstrates various dimensions of modernity at work, particularly the contradiction between the pre-modern Classical Chinese and a modernized language that translating the Manifesto requires, as well as socio-economic, political and cultural differences between China and Europe, where the Manifesto originated. The process of constantly retranslating the pamphlet constitutes a trajectory of China’s mega transition into a modern(izing) society in terms of language that is reflective of the economic base vs. the superstructure, and domestic and international socio-economic and political changes. It points to the unfinishability of modernity in translation, and the need to move away from ideological constraints and restraints to a more shared vision of modernity.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Marxism found its way to China when the nation was struggling for a way out of semi-feudalism and semi-colonialism into a brighter future envisioned by Marx. Over a century’s textual and extratextual translation of the Manifesto demonstrates various dimensions of modernity at work, particularly the contradiction between the pre-modern Classical Chinese and a modernized language that translating the Manifesto requires, as well as socio-economic, political and cultural differences between China and Europe, where the Manifesto originated. The process of constantly retranslating the pamphlet constitutes a trajectory of China’s mega transition into a modern(izing) society in terms of language that is reflective of the economic base vs. the superstructure, and domestic and international socio-economic and political changes. It points to the unfinishability of modernity in translation, and the need to move away from ideological constraints and restraints to a more shared vision of modernity.
Key concepts: Manifesto, Modernity, Communism, Ideology, Politics, China, Sociology, Aesthetics