2021•Expert Review of Cardiovascular TherapyRequires access

Antinociceptive effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine

Hatice Tolunay

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Background:Ranolazine and trimetazidine are piperazine derivatives used in antianginal therapy. There are data on the use of these drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of ranolazine and trimetazidine.Methods: Sixty patients who were started on trimetazidine or ranolazine treatment were included in the study. The patients were evaluated with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) on the first day of treatment and at the first month follow-up.Results: The SAQ scores of the patients given ranolazine were statistically significantly higher than the patients given trimetazidine. The most significant increase was observed in terms of treatment satisfaction (53.03 ± 8.11 vs. 72.88 ± 5.29, p < 0.001) and quality of life (49.79 ± 8.62 vs. 68.01 ± 0.65, p = 0.016). The decrease in VAS (p = 0.001) and the decrease in STAI scores (p = 0.002) after treatment in the ranolazine group were significantly higher than in the trimetazidine group.Conclusions: Ranolazine and trimetazidine are two effective drugs in antianginal treatment. While both drugs are effective on general systemic musculoskeletal pain and anxiety, the efficacy of ranolazine is more pronounced.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background:Ranolazine and trimetazidine are piperazine derivatives used in antianginal therapy. There are data on the use of these drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of ranolazine and trimetazidine.Methods: Sixty patients who were started on trimetazidine or ranolazine treatment were included in the study. The patients were evaluated with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) on the first day of treatment and at the first month follow-up.Results: The SAQ scores of the patients given ranolazine were statistically significantly higher than the patients given trimetazidine. The most significant increase was observed in terms of treatment satisfaction (53.03 ± 8.11 vs. 72.88 ± 5.29, p < 0.001) and quality of life (49.79 ± 8.62 vs. 68.01 ± 0.65, p = 0.016). The decrease in VAS (p = 0.001) and the decrease in STAI scores (p = 0.002) after treatment in the ranolazine group were significantly higher than in the trimetazidine group.Conclusions: Ranolazine and trimetazidine are two effective drugs in antianginal treatment. While both drugs are effective on general systemic musculoskeletal pain and anxiety, the efficacy of ranolazine is more pronounced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background:Ranolazine and trimetazidine are piperazine derivatives used in antianginal therapy. There are data on the use of these drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the antinociceptive effects of ranolazine and trimetazidine.Methods: Sixty patients who were started on trimetazidine or ranolazine treatment were included in the study. The patients were evaluated with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) on the first day of treatment and at the first month follow-up.Results: The SAQ scores of the patients given ranolazine were statistically significantly higher than the patients given trimetazidine. The most significant increase was observed in terms of treatment satisfaction (53.03 ± 8.11 vs. 72.88 ± 5.29, p < 0.001) and quality of life (49.79 ± 8.62 vs. 68.01 ± 0.65, p = 0.016). The decrease in VAS (p = 0.001) and the decrease in STAI scores (p = 0.002) after treatment in the ranolazine group were significantly higher than in the trimetazidine group.Conclusions: Ranolazine and trimetazidine are two effective drugs in antianginal treatment. While both drugs are effective on general systemic musculoskeletal pain and anxiety, the efficacy of ranolazine is more pronounced.

Key concepts: Trimetazidine, Ranolazine, Medicine, Visual analogue scale, Anesthesia, Quality of life (healthcare), Internal medicine, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antinociceptive effect of ranolazine and trimetazidine — Research Paper | ScholarLens