Inherent Jurisdiction, Judicial Power and Implied Guarantees under Chapter III of the Constitution
Wendy Lacey
Abstract
Wendy Lacey
Abstract
The implication of guarantees arising out of the separation of judicial power under Chapter III of the Australian Constitution is discussed. The inherent jurisdiction of Chapter III courts is closely related to existing approaches to implications drawn from that Chapter and to unduly interfere with, or remove that capacity of, the courts, could potentially require the courts to act in a non-judicial manner in the exercise of jurisdiction and could also violate the separation of powers under Chapter III.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The implication of guarantees arising out of the separation of judicial power under Chapter III of the Australian Constitution is discussed. The inherent jurisdiction of Chapter III courts is closely related to existing approaches to implications drawn from that Chapter and to unduly interfere with, or remove that capacity of, the courts, could potentially require the courts to act in a non-judicial manner in the exercise of jurisdiction and could also violate the separation of powers under Chapter III.
Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Constitution, Law, Separation of powers, Inherent powers, Power (physics), Political science, Judicial review