Separation of Powers and the Inherent Powers of the Judiciary Under the Tennessee Constitution
Eugene L. Shapiro
Abstract
Eugene L. Shapiro
Abstract
This article discusses the concept of inherent judicial power in Tennessee, in light of the principles governing the separation of powers under the Tennessee Constitution. It examines inherent tensions between Article 2, Sections 1 and 2 and Article 6, all of which contemplate that each branch of government must be free to function effectively, and it explores the question of judicial incursion into the legislative domain.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article discusses the concept of inherent judicial power in Tennessee, in light of the principles governing the separation of powers under the Tennessee Constitution. It examines inherent tensions between Article 2, Sections 1 and 2 and Article 6, all of which contemplate that each branch of government must be free to function effectively, and it explores the question of judicial incursion into the legislative domain.
Key concepts: Separation of powers, Constitution, Legislature, Inherent powers, Enumerated powers, Political science, Law, Power (physics)