Clinical effects of moist dressing combined with counterpart drainage on chronic wound therapy
Tonghua Wang, Liqin Xie, Xiongli Zhou, Lingling Yang, Hailian Qin
Abstract
Tonghua Wang, Liqin Xie, Xiongli Zhou, Lingling Yang, Hailian Qin
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effects of moist dressing combined with conterpart drainage on chronic wound therapy. Methods A total of 200 chronic wound patients were randomly admitted to either intervention group (n=100) or control group (n=100). The patients of control group adopted iodophor gauze and the patients of intervention group received moist dressing combined with counterpart drainage therapy. The clinical efficacy and wound healing time of the two groups were compared. Results The wound healing time of the intervention group were (21.3±9.3)d and (44.0±9.5)d in the control group (t=6.968, P<0.05). The effective power of the intervention group was 100%, so that was 87% in the control group with significant difference between them (P<0.05). Conclusions The implementation of moist dressing combined with countrerpart drainage in the chronic wound therapy can improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the wound healing time. Key words: Moist dressing; Counterpart drainage; Chronic wound
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To investigate the effects of moist dressing combined with conterpart drainage on chronic wound therapy. Methods A total of 200 chronic wound patients were randomly admitted to either intervention group (n=100) or control group (n=100). The patients of control group adopted iodophor gauze and the patients of intervention group received moist dressing combined with counterpart drainage therapy. The clinical efficacy and wound healing time of the two groups were compared. Results The wound healing time of the intervention group were (21.3±9.3)d and (44.0±9.5)d in the control group (t=6.968, P<0.05). The effective power of the intervention group was 100%, so that was 87% in the control group with significant difference between them (P<0.05). Conclusions The implementation of moist dressing combined with countrerpart drainage in the chronic wound therapy can improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the wound healing time. Key words: Moist dressing; Counterpart drainage; Chronic wound
Key concepts: Medicine, Iodophor, Surgery, Wound healing, Drainage, Significant difference, Wound dressing, Wound treatment