2017Zhonghua wuli yixue zazhiRequires access

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical rehabilitation for subacute cerebral infarction patients

Juan Fu, Nan Xia, Caili Ren, Shouguo Liu, Wenchao Yin, Hongxing Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness and medical cost-effectiveness of clinical rehabilitation for promoting the functional recovery of sub-acute cerebral infarction patients. Methods Totally 247 sub-acute patients with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into a clinical rehabilitation group of 129 and a routine rehabilitation group of 118. The clinical group received a standardized rehabilitation intervention and drug treatment, while the routine rehabilitation group received routine rehabilitation therapy and drug treatment. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and the modified Barthel index (MBI) were used to compare the two groups after the treatment and 3 and 6 weeks later. The hospital cost for six weeks was also compared between the 2 groups. Results At 3 and 6 weeks, improvement in the average FMA and MBI scores was observed in both groups but the inter-group differences were not significant. The total hospital cost of the clinical group was, however, significantly less than that of the others. Conclusion Clinical rehabilitation can improve the motor function and ability in the activities of daily living of stroke patients. It also has economic benefits. Key words: Cerebral infarction; Clinical rehabilitation; Motor function; Ability in the activities of daily living; Stroke

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To determine the effectiveness and medical cost-effectiveness of clinical rehabilitation for promoting the functional recovery of sub-acute cerebral infarction patients. Methods Totally 247 sub-acute patients with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into a clinical rehabilitation group of 129 and a routine rehabilitation group of 118. The clinical group received a standardized rehabilitation intervention and drug treatment, while the routine rehabilitation group received routine rehabilitation therapy and drug treatment. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and the modified Barthel index (MBI) were used to compare the two groups after the treatment and 3 and 6 weeks later. The hospital cost for six weeks was also compared between the 2 groups. Results At 3 and 6 weeks, improvement in the average FMA and MBI scores was observed in both groups but the inter-group differences were not significant. The total hospital cost of the clinical group was, however, significantly less than that of the others. Conclusion Clinical rehabilitation can improve the motor function and ability in the activities of daily living of stroke patients. It also has economic benefits. Key words: Cerebral infarction; Clinical rehabilitation; Motor function; Ability in the activities of daily living; Stroke

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To determine the effectiveness and medical cost-effectiveness of clinical rehabilitation for promoting the functional recovery of sub-acute cerebral infarction patients. Methods Totally 247 sub-acute patients with cerebral infarction were randomly divided into a clinical rehabilitation group of 129 and a routine rehabilitation group of 118. The clinical group received a standardized rehabilitation intervention and drug treatment, while the routine rehabilitation group received routine rehabilitation therapy and drug treatment. The Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) and the modified Barthel index (MBI) were used to compare the two groups after the treatment and 3 and 6 weeks later. The hospital cost for six weeks was also compared between the 2 groups. Results At 3 and 6 weeks, improvement in the average FMA and MBI scores was observed in both groups but the inter-group differences were not significant. The total hospital cost of the clinical group was, however, significantly less than that of the others. Conclusion Clinical rehabilitation can improve the motor function and ability in the activities of daily living of stroke patients. It also has economic benefits. Key words: Cerebral infarction; Clinical rehabilitation; Motor function; Ability in the activities of daily living; Stroke

Key concepts: Rehabilitation, Medicine, Physical therapy, Stroke (engine), Cerebral infarction, Barthel index, Motor function, Activities of daily living

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clinical rehabilitation for subacute cerebral infarction patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens